Re: [REGRESSION] snd-usb-audio: commit da3a7efff64e ("ALSA: usb-audio: Update for native DSD support quirks") breaks DSD playback on Musical Fidelity M6s DAC (2772:0502), plays ~8.8% fast
Jussi Laako <[email protected]> Thu, 9 Jul 2026 11:29:08 +0300
| Newsgroups | org.alsa-project.alsa-devel,dev.linux.lists.regressions |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi Salvador, No, native DSD with the M3x and M6x for example didn=E2=80=99t work = before I added the vendor flag. That is precisely why I added it. By the way, you can also just convert everything to 48k-base DSD during = playback and then the playback speed is correct. It is common that DACs = play 48k-base DSD with 44.1k-base clock (or just go silent or play = noise), but in this case it seems to be another way around. Best regards, - Jussi > On 9. Jul 2026, at 10.54, Salvador Blaya <[email protected]> wrote: >=20 > Hi Takashi, >=20 > Thank you - that approach would fit this case well, and the risks you > mention are fortunately minimal here: >=20 > - The M6s DAC has been discontinued for years and the defect was first > reported to the vendor (via their Windows ASIO driver users) back in > 2018, with no firmware fix ever published. I have an inquiry open > with Musical Fidelity about firmware and will report back if > anything changes. >=20 > - The only other model possibly sharing this ID, the M6sR successor, > exhibits the same defect per the Roon thread in my original report, > so an empty entry for 2772:0502 cannot break a working device. The > current MF models known to work with native DSD (M3x, M6x) already > worked before the vendor flag was added, so they use different IDs. >=20 > I'm happy to test the patch on my unit - both that native DSD is no > longer offered (MPD falling back to dsd2pcm as on 6.12.y) and that > normal PCM playback is unaffected. Just let me know. >=20 > Best regards, >=20 > Salvador >=20 > El jue, 9 jul 2026 a las 9:33, Takashi Iwai (<[email protected]>) = escribi=C3=B3: >>=20 >> On Thu, 09 Jul 2026 00:28:00 +0200, >> Jussi Laako wrote: >>>=20 >>> Hi, >>>=20 >>> I don=E2=80=99t think we currently have exclusion method for devices = with buggy firmware, which claim to support native DSD, but do it = incorrectly. And reverting with device specific white-listing is not a = good approach for future maintenance. Having to device-specific = white-list each new device appearing on the market from the manufacturer = just because some old device is broken is not really a sustainable = model. >>=20 >> While I fully agree that white-listing all needed devices won't = scale, >> blacklisting the broken device might work. We can an empty quirk >> entry for 2772:0502 for skipping the vendor match, something like >> below, as an ad hoc fix. >>=20 >> Though, this blindly assumes that there aren't so many broken = devices, >> and there will be no firmware fix or another model that works with = the >> same ID. If a model is relatively new and/or the vendor often = updates >> the firmware, such an entry can be risky, too. >>=20 >>=20 >> thanks, >>=20 >> Takashi >>=20 >> -- 8< -- >> --- a/sound/usb/quirks.c >> +++ b/sound/usb/quirks.c >> @@ -2463,6 +2463,8 @@ static const struct usb_audio_quirk_flags_table = quirk_flags_table[] =3D { >> QUIRK_FLAG_DSD_RAW), >> DEVICE_FLG(0x2708, 0x0002, /* Audient iD14 */ >> QUIRK_FLAG_IGNORE_CTL_ERROR), >> + DEVICE_FLG(0x2772, 0x0502, /* Musical Fidelity M6s DAC */ >> + 0), /* for avoiding QUIRK_FLAG_DSD_RAW with vendor = match */ >> DEVICE_FLG(0x2912, 0x30c8, /* Audioengine D1 */ >> QUIRK_FLAG_GET_SAMPLE_RATE), >> DEVICE_FLG(0x2a70, 0x1881, /* OnePlus Technology (Shenzhen) = Co., Ltd. BE02T */