No subject

assumed the frequencies and numbers were correct, which is why I
picked it up.

> Is this trying to add 4.9 GHz channels in general for multiple different
> use cases? And if so, what are those use cases? Or is this only for some
> public safety cases? And if so, for which regulatory domains?

I believe he has a client that requires this support in a Linux kernel.

> To be frank, I really don't see how this would be even close to a state
> that should be accepted into the upstream tree.

Fair enough I'm dropping this.

Kalle, I've marked this as rejected and archived on Patchwork.

Thanks,

-- 
Julian Calaby

Email: julian.calaby at gmail.com
Profile: http://www.google.com/profiles/julian.calaby/