[PATCH 6.12.y-cip 09/26] irqchip/renesas-rzg2l: Drop redundant IRQC_TINT_START check in rzg2l_irqc_alloc()

From: Biju Das <[email protected]>

[ Upstream commit 0109d24b4cdc2cdbc127f86cbede83adae2187d7 ]

The check `hwirq < IRQC_TINT_START` in rzg2l_irqc_alloc() is unnecessary as
the condition is already guaranteed to be false at that point in the code.

The outer `if (hwirq > IRQC_IRQ_COUNT)` block ensures that hwirq is always
above IRQC_IRQ_COUNT before reaching this check, and since IRQC_TINT_START
<= IRQC_IRQ_COUNT, the guard can never trigger.

Remove the dead code to simplify the allocation path.

Signed-off-by: Biju Das <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Biju Das <[email protected]>
---
 drivers/irqchip/irq-renesas-rzg2l.c | 3 ---
 1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-renesas-rzg2l.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-renesas-rzg2l.c
index 5f67013227c4..122d744afdf9 100644
--- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-renesas-rzg2l.c
+++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-renesas-rzg2l.c
@@ -488,9 +488,6 @@ static int rzg2l_irqc_alloc(struct irq_domain *domain, unsigned int virq,
 	if (hwirq > IRQC_IRQ_COUNT) {
 		tint = TINT_EXTRACT_GPIOINT(hwirq);
 		hwirq = TINT_EXTRACT_HWIRQ(hwirq);
-
-		if (hwirq < IRQC_TINT_START)
-			return -EINVAL;
 	}
 
 	if (hwirq > (IRQC_NUM_IRQ - 1))
-- 
2.43.0