Re: [PATCH v3] drm/amdgpu: skip BOs being torn down during GTT recovery
Christian König <[email protected]> Wed, 5 Aug 2026 11:25:11 +0200
| Newsgroups | org.freedesktop.lists.amd-gfx |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 8/5/26 10:58, Yifan Zhang wrote: > A GPU reset can race with BO teardown after the BO's GTT resource has > been marked for deletion but before its drm_mm node is removed. In this > window, amdgpu_gtt_mgr_recover() can treat the node as a live BO and try > to restore its GART mapping while its TT backing is being destroyed. > > Recolor the GTT node from amdgpu_bo_delete_mem_notify() so that recovery > skips it, reusing the existing color for ranges without a BO. The range > stays allocated until the resource is freed. > > This prevents reset recovery from accessing a BO whose backing storage > is no longer valid. > > v2: refine commit message. (David Francis) > v3: Remove new BO color. (Christian) > > Signed-off-by: Yifan Zhang <[email protected]> > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_gtt_mgr.c | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++ > drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ttm.c | 3 +++ > drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ttm.h | 1 + > 3 files changed, 27 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_gtt_mgr.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_gtt_mgr.c > index 0ea32561c4bc..6219233ff712 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_gtt_mgr.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_gtt_mgr.c > @@ -102,6 +102,29 @@ bool amdgpu_gtt_mgr_has_gart_addr(struct ttm_resource *res) > return drm_mm_node_allocated(&node->mm_nodes[0]); > } > > +/** > + * amdgpu_gtt_mgr_mark_bo_teardown - exclude a BO from GART recovery > + * > + * @tbo: TTM BO whose TT backing is about to be destroyed > + * > + * Keep the GART range allocated until the resource is freed, but make recovery > + * treat it like a range without a BO so it isn't touched after TT teardown has > + * started. > + */ > +void amdgpu_gtt_mgr_mark_bo_teardown(struct ttm_buffer_object *tbo) Avoiding the ttm_buffer object and giving ttm_resource_manager and ttm_resource separately would be better, but not a must have. > +{ > + struct amdgpu_device *adev = amdgpu_ttm_adev(tbo->bdev); > + struct ttm_range_mgr_node *node = to_ttm_range_mgr_node(tbo->resource); > + struct amdgpu_gtt_mgr *mgr = &adev->mman.gtt_mgr; > + > + dma_resv_assert_held(tbo->base.resv); > + > + spin_lock(&mgr->lock); > + if (drm_mm_node_allocated(&node->mm_nodes[0])) > + node->mm_nodes[0].color = GART_ENTRY_WITHOUT_BO_COLOR; We could rename GART_ENTRY_WITHOUT_BO_COLOR to something else, but also not a must have that should work for now. Feel free to add Acked-by: Christian König <[email protected]> to the patch. Regards, Christian. > + spin_unlock(&mgr->lock); > +} > + > /** > * amdgpu_gtt_mgr_new - allocate a new node > * > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ttm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ttm.c > index c4094edbdff1..a9067305b26d 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ttm.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ttm.c > @@ -1694,6 +1694,9 @@ static int amdgpu_ttm_access_memory(struct ttm_buffer_object *bo, > static void > amdgpu_bo_delete_mem_notify(struct ttm_buffer_object *bo) > { > + if (bo->resource && bo->resource->mem_type == TTM_PL_TT) > + amdgpu_gtt_mgr_mark_bo_teardown(bo); > + > amdgpu_bo_move_notify(bo, false, NULL); > } > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ttm.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ttm.h > index ff9e2e346609..af1e7fcc7175 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ttm.h > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ttm.h > @@ -145,6 +145,7 @@ int amdgpu_vram_mgr_init(struct amdgpu_device *adev); > void amdgpu_vram_mgr_fini(struct amdgpu_device *adev); > > bool amdgpu_gtt_mgr_has_gart_addr(struct ttm_resource *mem); > +void amdgpu_gtt_mgr_mark_bo_teardown(struct ttm_buffer_object *tbo); > void amdgpu_gtt_mgr_recover(struct amdgpu_gtt_mgr *mgr); > > int amdgpu_gtt_mgr_alloc_entries(struct amdgpu_gtt_mgr *mgr,