Re: [PATCH] drm/amd/pm: Fix incorrect avg vcn utilization in gpu_metrics

Boqun Feng <[email protected]>
Newsgroups org.freedesktop.lists.amd-gfx,org.freedesktop.lists.dri-devel,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Thu, Aug 13, 2026 at 08:51:22PM -0400, Alex Deucher wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 13, 2026 at 6:25 PM Boqun Feng <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Aug 13, 2026 at 06:01:47PM -0400, Alex Deucher wrote:
> > > On Thu, Aug 13, 2026 at 5:36 PM Boqun Feng <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Aug 05, 2026 at 07:02:21AM -0700, Boqun Feng wrote:
> > > > > In a Strix Halo system, a >100 average_vcn_activity in gpu_metrics can
> > > > > be observed by running the following command:
> > > > >
> > > > >     ffmpeg -hwaccel vappi -vappi_device /dev/dri/renderD128 -i \
> > > > >     ~/sample-10s.mp4 -vf hwupload,scale_vappi=format=nv12 -c:v \
> > > > >     h264_vappi /tmp/output.mp4
> > > > >
> > > > > This is incorrect because the value is supposed to be in [0-100] range.
> > > > >
> > > > > The cause of the issue is that the metrics.VcnActivity reported by
> > > > > smu_cmn_get_metrics_table() is a permyriad value instead of a percentage
> > > > > value (e.g. smu_v14_0_0_get_smu_metrics_data() has a division by 100 to
> > > > > report the vcn_busy_percent). Therefore fix this by applying the same
> > > > > division in smu_v14_0_0_get_gpu_metrics().
> > >
> > > I think this is correct as is.  smu_v14_0_0_get_smu_metrics_data() is
> > > used to fetch data for standardized formats like hwmon while
> > > smu_v14_0_0_get_gpu_metrics() is for dumping the raw metrics data.
> > >
> >
> > Well, then kgd_pp_interface.h needs some help?
> >
> > struct gpu_metrics_v3_0 {
> >         ...
> >         /* Utilization */
> >         /* time filtered GFX busy % [0-100] */
> >         uint16_t                        average_gfx_activity;
> >         /* time filtered VCN busy % [0-100] */
> >         uint16_t                        average_vcn_activity;
> >         ...
> > }
> >
> > Clearly it's not true.
> 
> That was likely copy and pasted from the firmware interface
> (smu14_driver_if_v14_0_0.h):
> uint16_t VcnActivity;                //Time filtered VCN busy % [0-100]
> 
> Other generations seem to do the same thing (raw data in metrics table
> and % in the hwmon type interfaces). E.g., smu_v13_0_4_ppt.c:
> smu_v13_0_4_get_gpu_metrics()
> gpu_metrics->average_mm_activity = metrics.UvdActivity;
> vs smu_v13_0_4_get_smu_metrics_data():
> *value = metrics->UvdActivity / 100;
> 

Could you help fix the document while you're at it? I cannot confirm by
myself the valid range of that raw data. Thanks!

Regards,
Boqun

> Alex
> 
> >
> > [Cc amdgpu_top]
> >
> > Regards,
> > Boqun
> >
> > > Alex
> > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Reported-by: Mark Janes <[email protected]>
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Boqun Feng <[email protected]>
> > > >
> > > > Ping?
> > > >
> > > > Regards,
> > > > Boqun
> > > >
> > > > > ---
> > > > >  drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/swsmu/smu14/smu_v14_0_0_ppt.c | 3 ++-
> > > > >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > > > >
> > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/swsmu/smu14/smu_v14_0_0_ppt.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/swsmu/smu14/smu_v14_0_0_ppt.c
> > > > > index 568665265a13..1058338344b0 100644
> > > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/swsmu/smu14/smu_v14_0_0_ppt.c
> > > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/swsmu/smu14/smu_v14_0_0_ppt.c
> > > > > @@ -566,7 +566,8 @@ static ssize_t smu_v14_0_0_get_gpu_metrics(struct smu_context *smu,
> > > > >       gpu_metrics->temperature_skin = metrics.SkinTemp;
> > > > >
> > > > >       gpu_metrics->average_gfx_activity = metrics.GfxActivity;
> > > > > -     gpu_metrics->average_vcn_activity = metrics.VcnActivity;
> > > > > +     /* metrics.VcnActivity is permyriad, convert it to percentage. */
> > > > > +     gpu_metrics->average_vcn_activity = metrics.VcnActivity / 100;
> > > > >       memcpy(&gpu_metrics->average_ipu_activity[0],
> > > > >               &metrics.IpuBusy[0],
> > > > >               sizeof(uint16_t) * 8);
> > > > > --
> > > > > 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)
> > > > >
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.