RE: [PATCH v2] drm/amdgpu/userq: fix lock missing for userq fence error set

"Liang, Prike" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups org.freedesktop.lists.amd-gfx
Message-ID <DS7PR12MB60058CCC10065C661C05B2C1FBA52@DS7PR12MB6005.namprd12.prod.outlook.com>
AMD General

Ping..

Regards,
      Prike

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Liang, Prike <[email protected]>
> Sent: Friday, August 14, 2026 11:33 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Cc: Deucher, Alexander <[email protected]>; Koenig, Christian
> <[email protected]>; Liang, Prike <[email protected]>
> Subject: [PATCH v2] drm/amdgpu/userq: fix lock missing for userq fence error set
>
> amdgpu_userq_fence_driver() and amdgpu_userq_fence_driver_destroy()
> don't acquire the dma_fence spinlock, so locking the dma_fence lock before test the
> signaled state and set error state.
>
> Signed-off-by: Prike Liang <[email protected]>
> ---
>  .../gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_userq_fence.c   | 20 ++++++++++++-------
>  1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_userq_fence.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_userq_fence.c
> index 19af1adc2921..09e2079cfdbd 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_userq_fence.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_userq_fence.c
> @@ -191,14 +191,15 @@ void amdgpu_userq_fence_driver_destroy(struct kref
> *ref)
>       struct dma_fence *f;
>
>       spin_lock_irqsave(&fence_drv->fence_list_lock, flags);
> +     lockdep_assert_held(&fence_drv->fence_list_lock);
>       list_for_each_entry_safe(fence, tmp, &fence_drv->fences, link) {
>               f = &fence->base;
> -
> -             if (!dma_fence_is_signaled(f)) {
> +             spin_lock(dma_fence_spinlock(f));
> +             if (!dma_fence_is_signaled_locked(f)) {
>                       dma_fence_set_error(f, -ECANCELED);
> -                     dma_fence_signal(f);
> +                     dma_fence_signal_locked(f);
>               }
> -
> +             spin_unlock(dma_fence_spinlock(f));
>               list_del(&fence->link);
>               dma_fence_put(f);
>       }
> @@ -423,11 +424,16 @@ amdgpu_userq_fence_driver_set_error(struct
> amdgpu_userq_fence *fence,
>       struct dma_fence *f;
>
>       spin_lock_irqsave(&fence_drv->fence_list_lock, flags);
> -
> +     lockdep_assert_held(&fence_drv->fence_list_lock);
>       f = rcu_dereference_protected(&fence->base,
>                                     lockdep_is_held(&fence_drv->fence_list_lock));
> -     if (f && !dma_fence_is_signaled_locked(f))
> -             dma_fence_set_error(f, error);
> +     if (f) {
> +             /* nest f->lock inside fence_list_lock */
> +             spin_lock(dma_fence_spinlock(f));
> +             if (!dma_fence_is_signaled_locked(f))
> +                     dma_fence_set_error(f, error);
> +             spin_unlock(dma_fence_spinlock(f));
> +     }
>       spin_unlock_irqrestore(&fence_drv->fence_list_lock, flags);  }
>
> --
> 2.34.1
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.