Re: [PATCH v3] drm/amdgpu: avoid force-completing uninitialized UVD rings

Christian König <[email protected]>
Newsgroups org.freedesktop.lists.amd-gfx
Message-ID <[email protected]>

On 8/19/26 08:43, Bob Zhou wrote:
> uvd_v7_0_sw_init() does not initialize the UVD decode ring for an
> SR-IOV VF. However, amdgpu_uvd_resume() unconditionally force-completes
> the decode ring when restoring its fence sequence.
> 
> Skip fence completion when the fence driver is not initialized.
> 
> Fixes: 043f2271e2d0 ("drm/amdgpu: mark force completed fences with -ECANCELED")
> Signed-off-by: Bob Zhou <[email protected]>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_uvd.c | 3 ++-
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_uvd.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_uvd.c
> index 228a405a94c4f..ecd7caa95d4b2 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_uvd.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_uvd.c
> @@ -517,7 +517,8 @@ int amdgpu_uvd_resume(struct amdgpu_device *adev)
>  			}
>  			memset_io(ptr, 0, size);
>  			/* to restore uvd fence seq */
> -			amdgpu_fence_driver_force_completion(&adev->uvd.inst[i].ring, NULL);
> +			if (adev->uvd.inst[i].ring.fence_drv.initialized)
> +				amdgpu_fence_driver_force_completion(&adev->uvd.inst[i].ring, NULL);

That check should potentially be inside amdgpu_fence_driver_force_completion(), apart from that it looks good to me.

Regards,
Christian.

>  		}
>  	}
>  	return 0;
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.