Re: [RFC PATCH v3 0/1] drm/amdgpu: MMIO TLB invalidation fallback when KIQ is wedged after S4 resume

Denis Pisarev <[email protected]>
Newsgroups org.freedesktop.lists.amd-gfx,org.freedesktop.lists.dri-devel,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel
Message-ID <CAMpx=TVt=iHo-Tj=3yFv+E0PKxMf+e-GO7oeMZMhLJCm4kKD_w@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Christian, Alex,

Understood regarding the fallback - dropping that approach. A working
KIQ after S4 resume is the real fix.

Regarding GFXOFF, I agree that a gated-off CP/ME/KIQ would also fail
the ring test, which aligns with the data. The ring test passes upon
resuming and sched.ready is set; however, the write-reg/wait-ack
handshake begins to fail during runtime, starting in the same second
as the thaw and persisting for hours (80-140 errors per hour, measured
over 9+ hours). So the KIQ initialises fine, but then stops completing
those packets.

The GFXOFF attribution comes from a single-variable experiment only:
same workload, one hibernation cycle each. GFXOFF held off across the
whole S4 cycle (disabled before hibernating and verified to be still
off after resuming): zero errors. Also zero errors over 15 minutes
after re-enabling it post-resuming. Plain S3 suspend never triggers
it. This is merely a correlation; I cannot prove that it is a
mechanism. The existing semaphore workaround comment in gmc_v9_0.c
about losing invalidate acknowledge state across power-gating cycles
appears to be relevant, but I cannot prove that. I am happy to run
whatever tracing is required to identify the mechanism from the
affected machine (RLC/ME state, gfx_off_state sampled at the time of
failure, KIQ fence timestamps and register dumps).

Thanks,
Denis

On Mon, 24 Aug 2026 at 20:31, Alex Deucher <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Aug 24, 2026 at 12:30 PM Denis Pisarev <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > v3 addresses the two findings from the sashiko-bot review of v2.
> > Failure data and trigger isolation are unchanged (bugzilla 219492):
> > S4 resume on Cezanne (gmc_v9, GFXOFF) wedges KIQ TLB flushes at
> > 80-140/hour for 9+ hours with sched.ready true throughout; holding
> > GFXOFF off across the S4 cycle produces zero errors.
> >
> > 1. [High] "VFs and interrupt contexts silently drop TLB flushes once
> >    the threshold is reached" - correct, and fixed. In v3 the latch
> >    only reroutes bare metal process context to MMIO. VFs and IRQ
> >    contexts keep submitting to KIQ exactly as before this patch, with
> >    per-failure logging, because they have no MMIO alternative; there
> >    is no longer any code path that drops a flush without attempting
> >    and logging.
> >
> > 2. [High] "KIQ and MMIO race on the same invalidation engine if KIQ
> >    recovers" - this remains the documented open question; no code
> >    change in v3. Our analysis: once latched, this path submits no new
> >    KIQ commands, so the exposure is limited to already-queued stale
> >    commands and the recovery transition window. The engine serializes
> >    requests internally, so the realistic worst case is a lost flush
> >    request caught by the existing ACK timeout ("Timeout waiting for VM
> >    flush ACK!"), not silent state corruption. If maintainers consider
> >    a fence necessary (or a dedicated invalidate engine for the MMIO
> >    path), guidance on the preferred mechanism would be welcome.
> >
> > Full patch history: v1 (initial fallback+counter), v2 (GFXOFF hold,
> > per-instance counter, irqsave, VF/IRQ restrictions, MES error
> > propagation) - all from bot review; v3 (this one) fixes the VF/IRQ
> > drop regression the bot found in v2.
> >
> > Also still open from the cover letters: the alternative direction of
> > fixing the S4 resume ordering itself (RLC/ME vs GFXOFF) instead of a
> > runtime fallback. Happy to run tracing on the affected hardware.
> >
>
> If that's a problem, that should be fixed.  That said, did you have
> any success with the branch I proposed?
>
> Alex
>
> > Patch 1/1 follows.
> >
> > Denis Pisarev
> >
> > Denis Pisarev (1):
> >   drm/amdgpu: fall back to MMIO TLB invalidation when KIQ is
> >     unresponsive
> >
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu.h     |   2 +
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_gfx.h |   2 +
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_gmc.c |  18 ++--
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_gmc.h |   2 +-
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gmc_v9_0.c   | 123 +++++++++++++++++++-----
> >  5 files changed, 114 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)
> >
> > --
> > 2.55.0
> >
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.