Re: [PATCH 3/3] drm/msm: detach the ARM DMA mapping before attaching our own domain

Konrad Dybcio <[email protected]>
Newsgroups org.freedesktop.lists.dri-devel,dev.linux.lists.iommu,org.infradead.lists.linux-arm-kernel,org.infradead.lists.linux-rockchip,org.kernel.vger.linux-arm-msm,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On 7/30/26 3:58 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 30, 2026 at 03:42:58PM +0200, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
>> On 7/30/26 3:29 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
>>> On ARM32 with CONFIG_ARM_DMA_USE_IOMMU, arch_setup_dma_ops() creates a
>>> dma_iommu_mapping for every IOMMU-backed device and attaches its domain
>>> to the device's IOMMU group. That domain is neither the group's default
>>> nor its blocking domain, so when msm_iommu_new() later attaches the
>>> domain the driver manages itself, __iommu_attach_group() refuses it:
>>
>> [...]
>>
>>> +#if defined(CONFIG_ARM_DMA_USE_IOMMU)
>>> +#include <asm/dma-iommu.h>
>>> +#else
>>> +#define arm_iommu_detach_device(...)	({ })
>>> +#define arm_iommu_release_mapping(...)	({ })
>>> +#define to_dma_iommu_mapping(dev)	NULL
>>> +#endif
>>
>> I see this is prior art, but should we support this config being off?
> 
> Yes. For example, on arm64.

Right

Reviewed-by: Konrad Dybcio <[email protected]>

Konrad
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.