Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] dt-bindings: display: Add GlandaGPU binding

> openrisc is arch.
> opencores is entire org. Are you saying that "Glanda" is this one:
> https://www.glanda.com.au/
> and opencores releases entire SoCs, thus they integrate their own IPs
> there into final product. I agree though, that opencores should not
> define standalone generic compatibles.

Fair, those precedents don't really hold up then.

No relation to glanda.com.au, I wasn't even aware of that company.
This is just a personal hobby project, not a company or organization.

Given that, what would you suggest instead? I'm open to using a
board-specific compatible as the primary match as discussed, or
whatever naming scheme you'd consider appropriate for an individual's
hobby project.

Best regards,
Leander