Re: [PATCH V4 2/2] gpu/tests/gpu_buddy: Add KUnit test for gpu_buddy_allocated_addr_to_block
Matthew Auld <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | org.freedesktop.lists.dri-devel,org.freedesktop.lists.intel-xe |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 06/08/2026 06:36, Tejas Upadhyay wrote: > Add a new KUnit test gpu_test_buddy_addr_to_block() that validates the > gpu_buddy_allocated_addr_to_block() helper which traces a address back > to its allocated buddy block. > > The test covers: > - Exact address matching returns the correct allocated block > - An unallocated address inside the manager should return NULL > - An address outside the manager should return -ENXIO > > v4(MattA): > - Add test for unaligned address > v3(Sashiko): > - remove unused target_addr variable > v2(Sashiko): > - Drop the mutex and lockdep annotation; standalone KUnit tests do > not register a driver lock. > > Signed-off-by: Tejas Upadhyay <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld <[email protected]> > --- > drivers/gpu/tests/gpu_buddy_test.c | 45 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 45 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/tests/gpu_buddy_test.c b/drivers/gpu/tests/gpu_buddy_test.c > index 7df5c2ae83bb..04e425eb8bdd 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/tests/gpu_buddy_test.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/tests/gpu_buddy_test.c > @@ -1381,6 +1381,50 @@ static void gpu_test_buddy_alloc_exceeds_max_order(struct kunit *test) > gpu_buddy_fini(&mm); > } > > +static void gpu_test_buddy_addr_to_block(struct kunit *test) > +{ > + struct gpu_buddy_block *allocated_block, *found_block; > + LIST_HEAD(allocated_list); > + const u64 test_size = SZ_4M + SZ_2M; > + const u64 alloc_start = SZ_4M; > + const u64 alloc_size = SZ_4K; > + const u64 chunk_size = SZ_4K; > + struct gpu_buddy mm; > + > + KUNIT_ASSERT_FALSE_MSG(test, gpu_buddy_init(&mm, test_size, chunk_size), > + "buddy_init failed\n"); > + > + KUNIT_ASSERT_FALSE_MSG(test, gpu_buddy_alloc_blocks(&mm, alloc_start, > + alloc_start + alloc_size, > + alloc_size, chunk_size, > + &allocated_list, 0), > + "buddy_alloc failed\n"); > + > + allocated_block = list_first_entry(&allocated_list, struct gpu_buddy_block, link); > + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, gpu_buddy_block_offset(allocated_block), alloc_start); > + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, gpu_buddy_block_size(&mm, allocated_block), alloc_size); > + > + found_block = gpu_buddy_allocated_addr_to_block(&mm, alloc_start); > + KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, found_block, allocated_block); > + > + /* Unaligned address inside the allocated block (should resolve to the same block) */ > + found_block = gpu_buddy_allocated_addr_to_block(&mm, alloc_start + 16); > + KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, found_block, allocated_block); > + > + /* An unallocated address inside the manager should return NULL. */ > + found_block = gpu_buddy_allocated_addr_to_block(&mm, > + alloc_start - chunk_size); > + KUNIT_EXPECT_NULL(test, found_block); > + > + /* An address outside the manager should return -ENXIO. */ > + found_block = gpu_buddy_allocated_addr_to_block(&mm, test_size); > + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, PTR_ERR(found_block), -ENXIO); > + > + /* 3. Standard inline cleanup flow */ > + gpu_buddy_free_list(&mm, &allocated_list, 0); > + gpu_buddy_fini(&mm); > +} > + > static int gpu_buddy_suite_init(struct kunit_suite *suite) > { > while (!random_seed) > @@ -1405,6 +1449,7 @@ static struct kunit_case gpu_buddy_tests[] = { > KUNIT_CASE(gpu_test_buddy_alloc_exceeds_max_order), > KUNIT_CASE(gpu_test_buddy_offset_aligned_allocation), > KUNIT_CASE(gpu_test_buddy_subtree_offset_alignment_stress), > + KUNIT_CASE(gpu_test_buddy_addr_to_block), > {} > }; >