Re: [PATCH 3/4] drm/amdgpu: Remove is_idle (non trivial functions)

[email protected]
Newsgroups org.freedesktop.lists.dri-devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Low] Incomplete API cleanup: The `is_idle` function pointer remains defined in `struct amd_ip_funcs`.
--

--- Patch [3]: [PATCH 3/4] drm/amdgpu: Remove is_idle (non trivial functions) ---
commit cf17e80a1ef9c0d7e6925465357af056c949e840
Author: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <[email protected]>

drm/amdgpu: Remove is_idle (non trivial functions)

This commit removes the various is_idle implementations across the amdgpu
driver since the method is never called. The same logic is mostly duplicated
in the wait_for_idle method which remains in use.

> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/cik_ih.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/cik_ih.c
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/cik_ih.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/cik_ih.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -435,7 +424,6 @@ static const struct amd_ip_funcs cik_ih_ip_funcs = {
>  	.hw_fini = cik_ih_hw_fini,
>  	.suspend = cik_ih_suspend,
>  	.resume = cik_ih_resume,
> -	.is_idle = cik_ih_is_idle,
>  	.wait_for_idle = cik_ih_wait_for_idle,

[Severity: Low]
Since we are removing the .is_idle assignments across the tree, is it also
worth removing the is_idle function pointer from the struct amd_ip_funcs
definition in drivers/gpu/drm/amd/include/amd_shared.h to complete the
API cleanup?

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/[email protected]?part=3
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.