Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] Missing default error case in the feature matrix format switch allows out-of-bounds DMA.
--
--- Patch [1]: [PATCH] accel: ethosu: Don't read the U65 rounding mode as a storage mode ---
commit 1513ddc6b4e0eb1db33e857fa9c9f18ec8c80157
Author: Tomeu Vizoso <[email protected]>
accel: ethosu: Don't read the U65 rounding mode as a storage mode
This commit modifies the ethosu driver to stop reading bits 15:14 of
the precision field as a storage mode on U65 NPUs. On U65, this field
holds the rounding mode instead, so the storage mode is now forced to 0
for these devices to prevent command stream parsing failures.
> diff --git a/drivers/accel/ethosu/ethosu_gem.c b/drivers/accel/ethosu/ethosu_gem.c
> index d50fed64d4d93..fa37a190e9fff 100644
> --- a/drivers/accel/ethosu/ethosu_gem.c
> +++ b/drivers/accel/ethosu/ethosu_gem.c
> @@ -204,7 +204,7 @@ static u64 feat_matrix_length(struct ethosu_device *edev,
> struct feat_matrix *fm,
> u32 x, u32 y, u32 c, bool ofm)
> {
> - u32 element_size, storage = fm->precision >> 14;
> + u32 element_size, storage = ethosu_is_u65(edev) ? 0 : fm->precision >> 14;
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but by forcing storage to 0 on U65, does this
inadvertently allow uninitialized precision values to bypass storage
validation?
If a command stream omits the NPU_SET_IFM_PRECISION command, fm->precision is
initialized to 0xffff. Because storage is now forced to 0, this bypasses the
earlier switch (storage) check which would have rejected it as 3.
Later in feat_matrix_length(), there is a switch for the format:
switch ((fm->precision >> 6) & 0x3) { // format
case 0: //nhwc:
element_size = BIT((fm->precision >> (ofm ? 1 : 2)) & 0x3);
addr += x * fm->stride_x + c * element_size;
break;
case 1: //nhcwb16:
element_size = BIT((fm->precision >> (ofm ? 1 : 2)) & 0x3);
addr += (c / 16) * fm->stride_c + (16 * x + (c & 0xf)) * element_size;
break;
}
Because there is no default error case, formats 2 and 3 fall through without
adding the width and depth (x and c) components to the required length.
Does this result in an under-calculated buffer length that bypasses the
driver's GEM size validation and could allow out-of-bounds DMA accesses?
> int tile = 0;
> u64 addr;
>
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/[email protected]?part=1
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not
affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for
the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.