Re: [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915/cdclk: Avoid spurious cdclk sanitization on PTL+

Rodrigo Vivi <[email protected]>
Newsgroups org.freedesktop.lists.intel-gfx,org.freedesktop.lists.intel-xe,org.kernel.vger.stable
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Fri, Jul 17, 2026 at 07:05:26PM +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 17, 2026 at 06:51:06PM +0300, Ville Syrjala wrote:
> > From: Ville Syrjälä <[email protected]>
> > 
> > Apparently PTL+ no longer has the cd2x pipe select field in
> > CDCLK_CTL. Take that into account during CDCLK sanitization.
> > 
> > This currently triggers a spurious CDCLK sanitization during
> > driver load on PTL+ which will causes a visible glitch on all
> > active displays.
> > 
> > Cc: [email protected]
> > Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/xe/kernel/-/work_items/8550
> > Fixes: 3f9de66f8acb ("drm/i915/cdclk: Fix up CDCLK_FREQ_DECIMAL without a full PLL re-enable")
> > Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <[email protected]>
> > ---
> 
> Unfortunately the regression itself has a cc:stable on it, so we'll

it has a fixes tag, not a cc:stable itself, but yeah, that is enough to
reach the stable backports indeed...

> need to backport this fix as well.
> 
> To do that cleanly we need to pick up these as well:
> commit cd16e794aead ("drm/i915/cdclk: Clean up CDCLK_CTL defines")

you meant
commit aa8faabadc59 ("drm/i915/cdclk: Clean up CDCLK_CTL defines")
right?

> commit 67d77d9472c6 ("drm/i915/cdclk: Introduce bxt_cdclk_cd2x_pipe_mask() and use it")

I can pick these for the -fixes round, but for the stable we need to remember
to tell Greg and Sasha whenever we get their automated email saying that the
patch has failed to apply...

> 
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cdclk.c | 6 ++++--
> >  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cdclk.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cdclk.c
> > index a53d88727177..9e5e15b0c4d1 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cdclk.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cdclk.c
> > @@ -2381,8 +2381,10 @@ static void bxt_sanitize_cdclk(struct intel_display *display)
> >  	 * dividers both syncing to an active pipe, or asynchronously
> >  	 * (PIPE_NONE).
> >  	 */
> > -	cdctl &= ~bxt_cdclk_cd2x_pipe_mask(display);
> > -	cdctl |= bxt_cdclk_cd2x_pipe(display, INVALID_PIPE);
> > +	if (DISPLAY_VER(display) < 30) {
> > +		cdctl &= ~bxt_cdclk_cd2x_pipe_mask(display);
> > +		cdctl |= bxt_cdclk_cd2x_pipe(display, INVALID_PIPE);
> > +	}
> >  
> >  	if (cdctl != expected) {
> >  		if (DISPLAY_VER(display) < 20) {
> > -- 
> > 2.54.0
> 
> -- 
> Ville Syrjälä
> Intel
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.