[PATCH v3] drm/i915/kunit: DP Link: Use if statements instead of for loops

Jonathan Cavitt <[email protected]>
Newsgroups org.freedesktop.lists.intel-gfx,org.freedesktop.lists.intel-xe
Message-ID <[email protected]>
The static functions get_target_config and get_fallback_config in
intel_dp_link_test.c use for loops to determine if the requested index of
the config set is in the bounds of the config set entry list.

Reconfigure these functions to use if statements instead, as these for
loops are only run for a single iteration.

Issue caught by static analysis.

v2: (Michal)
- Change i <= 0 check to i == 0, as i cannot be negative by assertion
- Remove unnecessary newlines

v3:
- Misc. checkpatch fixes
- Resubmit to exercise target kunit test

Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cavitt <[email protected]>
Cc: Imre Deak <[email protected]>
Cc: Michal Grzelak <[email protected]>
Cc: Jani Nikula <[email protected]>
---
 .../i915/display/tests/intel_dp_link_test.c   | 34 ++++++++-----------
 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/tests/intel_dp_link_test.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/tests/intel_dp_link_test.c
index 67c6fe9f1812..608b7a9d60bf 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/tests/intel_dp_link_test.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/tests/intel_dp_link_test.c
@@ -1215,22 +1215,20 @@ static bool get_fallback_config(const struct test_config_table *expected_table,
 	struct kunit *test = expected_table->test;
 	const struct link_config_set *config_set =
 		get_fallback_configs_for_output_type(test, output_type);
+	const struct intel_dp_link_config *config;
 	int i;
 
 	i = lookup_config(config_set, target_config);
 	KUNIT_ASSERT_GE(test, i, 0);
 
-	for (i--; i >= 0; i--) {
-		const struct intel_dp_link_config *config =
-			&config_set->entries[i];
+	if (!i)
+		return false;
 
-		assert_config_is_supported(expected_table, config);
-		*fallback_config = *config;
+	config = &config_set->entries[i - 1];
+	assert_config_is_supported(expected_table, config);
+	*fallback_config = *config;
 
-		return true;
-	}
-
-	return false;
+	return true;
 }
 
 static bool get_target_config(const struct test_config_table *expected_table,
@@ -1240,19 +1238,17 @@ static bool get_target_config(const struct test_config_table *expected_table,
 	struct kunit *test = expected_table->test;
 	const struct link_config_set *config_set =
 		get_target_configs_for_output_type(test, output_type);
-	int i;
+	const struct intel_dp_link_config *config;
+	int i = config_set->size - 1;
 
-	for (i = config_set->size - 1; i >= 0; i--) {
-		const struct intel_dp_link_config *config =
-			&config_set->entries[i];
+	if (i < 0)
+		return false;
 
-		assert_config_is_supported(expected_table, config);
-		*target = *config;
+	config = &config_set->entries[i];
+	assert_config_is_supported(expected_table, config);
+	*target = *config;
 
-		return true;
-	}
-
-	return false;
+	return true;
 }
 
 static void test_fallback_seq(struct kunit *test,
-- 
2.53.0
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.