Re: [PATCH] drm/xe/pm: do not warn about missing runtime PM protection after hot-unplug
Matthew Brost <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | org.freedesktop.lists.intel-xe |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Thu, Aug 06, 2026 at 02:38:03AM -0700, Matthew Brost wrote: > On Thu, Aug 06, 2026 at 10:30:20AM +0200, Raag Jadav wrote: > > On Thu, Aug 06, 2026 at 02:27:12PM +0530, Nitin Gote wrote: > > > Exec queues are owned by user fds and are destroyed when the fd is closed. > > > After hot-unplug this can happen from a deferred close during process > > > exit, after the device has been removed and runtime PM has been disabled. > > > The queue destroy path can call xe_pm_runtime_get_noresume(), and since > > > runtime PM is disabled pm_runtime_get_if_in_use() returns no reference, > > > so it warns about "Missing outer runtime PM protection". > > > > > > This is a false positive for the hot-unplug teardown case. The device is > > > already unplugged, and the queue destroy path that triggered this warning > > > was checked and does not touch hardware state after unplug. GuC has already > > > been sanitized by guc_fini_hw(), so no H2G is sent and the hardware > > > teardown path is no longer reachable. > > > > > > Skip the warning when the DRM device is already unplugged. > > > > > > Observed with new IGT core_hotunplug subtests: > > > igt@core_hotunplug@hotreplug-with-load > > > igt@core_hotunplug@hotunplug-rescan-with-load > > > > > > v2: > > > - Drop the drm_dev_is_unplugged() bypass from guc_exec_queue_destroy() > > > and instead exclude hot-unplug from the WARN in > > > xe_pm_runtime_get_noresume(). (Matthew Brost) > > > > > I don't think this was suggestion but also I believe I misunderstood the > problem, but maybe this works. > > > > v3: > > > - Clarify that the queue destroy path was checked and does not touch > > > hardware state after unplug. (Matthew Auld) > > > > > > Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/725773/?series=166744&rev=4 > > > Cc: Matthew Brost <[email protected]> > > > Cc: Matthew Auld <[email protected]> > > > Assisted-by: GitHub-Copilot:claude-opus-4.8 > > > Signed-off-by: Nitin Gote <[email protected]> > > > --- > > > drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pm.c | 5 ++++- > > > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pm.c > > > index a5289a9df8d2..a038687d5b2c 100644 > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pm.c > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pm.c > > > @@ -10,6 +10,7 @@ > > > #include <linux/suspend.h> > > > #include <linux/dmi.h> > > > > > > +#include <drm/drm_drv.h> > > > #include <drm/drm_managed.h> > > > #include <drm/ttm/ttm_placement.h> > > > > > > @@ -914,7 +915,9 @@ void xe_pm_runtime_get_noresume(struct xe_device *xe) > > > > From the documentation > > > > * This function should be used in inner places where it is surely already > > * protected by outer-bound callers of `xe_pm_runtime_get`. > > > > We should have those. > > > > if (!ref) { > > > pm_runtime_get_noresume(xe->drm.dev); > > > - drm_WARN(&xe->drm, !xe_pm_suspending_or_resuming(xe), > > > + drm_WARN(&xe->drm, > > > + !drm_dev_is_unplugged(&xe->drm) && > > > + !xe_pm_suspending_or_resuming(xe), > > > > So IMO this is more of a band-aid. > > > > So if I'm understanding the problem correctly, > pm_runtime_get_if_in_use() (via guc_exec_queue_add_msg()) fails when the > device is unplugged? I don't see how the PM reference count could be > zero, regardless of whether the device is plugged in or unplugged. > > My suggestion was (and still is) that guc_exec_queue_destroy() should > always add a message and determine whether the device/firmware is still > alive while processing that message, then either kick the destory or > issue H2G. Other messages likely are also missing proper device alive > checks too. > > If, for some reason, obtaining a PM reference via > xe_pm_runtime_get_noresume() doesn't work when the device is unplugged, > then that logic should be handled in the message submission layer. For > example, use drm_dev_enter()/drm_dev_exit() for hot-unplug protection, > only take a PM reference if the device is still bound, encode that > information into the message, and then determine the appropriate next > steps when the message is processed. > Below is rough sketch of what I was thinking. We can also probably rip out EXEC_QUEUE_FLAG_PERMANENT then too. We'd also need solid explaination how why xe_pm_runtime_get_noresume doesn't work if device is unplugged, as that part it unclear to me too. diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_submit.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_submit.c index 9036f89dff7d..08000f8db28a 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_submit.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_submit.c @@ -1812,32 +1812,15 @@ static void __guc_exec_queue_destroy_async(struct work_struct *w) static void guc_exec_queue_destroy_async(struct xe_exec_queue *q) { INIT_WORK(&q->guc->destroy_async, __guc_exec_queue_destroy_async); - - /* We must block on kernel engines so slabs are empty on driver unload */ - if (q->flags & EXEC_QUEUE_FLAG_PERMANENT || exec_queue_wedged(q)) - guc_exec_queue_do_destroy(q); - else - xe_destroy_wq_queue(&q->guc->destroy_async); + xe_destroy_wq_queue(&q->guc->destroy_async); } -static void __guc_exec_queue_destroy(struct xe_guc *guc, struct xe_exec_queue *q) -{ - /* - * Might be done from within the GPU scheduler, need to do async as we - * fini the scheduler when the engine is fini'd, the scheduler can't - * complete fini within itself (circular dependency). Async resolves - * this we and don't really care when everything is fini'd, just that it - * is. - */ - guc_exec_queue_destroy_async(q); -} - -static void __guc_exec_queue_process_msg_cleanup(struct xe_sched_msg *msg) +static void __guc_exec_queue_process_msg_cleanup(struct xe_sched_msg *msg, + bool bound) { struct xe_exec_queue *q = msg->private_data; struct xe_guc *guc = exec_queue_to_guc(q); - xe_gt_assert(guc_to_gt(guc), !(q->flags & EXEC_QUEUE_FLAG_PERMANENT)); trace_xe_exec_queue_cleanup_entity(q); /* @@ -1850,10 +1833,10 @@ static void __guc_exec_queue_process_msg_cleanup(struct xe_sched_msg *msg) * it is safe to directly destroy the exec queue on driver side, as the GuC * will not process further requests and all resources must be cleaned up locally. */ - if (exec_queue_registered(q) && xe_uc_fw_is_running(&guc->fw)) + if (bound && exec_queue_registered(q) && xe_uc_fw_is_running(&guc->fw)) disable_scheduling_deregister(guc, q); else - __guc_exec_queue_destroy(guc, q); + guc_exec_queue_destroy_async(q); } static bool guc_exec_queue_allowed_to_change_state(struct xe_exec_queue *q) @@ -1861,12 +1844,13 @@ static bool guc_exec_queue_allowed_to_change_state(struct xe_exec_queue *q) return !exec_queue_killed_or_banned_or_wedged(q) && exec_queue_registered(q); } -static void __guc_exec_queue_process_msg_set_sched_props(struct xe_sched_msg *msg) +static void __guc_exec_queue_process_msg_set_sched_props(struct xe_sched_msg *msg, + bool bound) { struct xe_exec_queue *q = msg->private_data; struct xe_guc *guc = exec_queue_to_guc(q); - if (guc_exec_queue_allowed_to_change_state(q)) + if (guc_exec_queue_allowed_to_change_state(q) && bound) init_policies(guc, q); kfree(msg); } @@ -1904,13 +1888,14 @@ static void suspend_fence_signal(struct xe_exec_queue *q) __suspend_fence_signal(q); } -static void __guc_exec_queue_process_msg_suspend(struct xe_sched_msg *msg) +static void __guc_exec_queue_process_msg_suspend(struct xe_sched_msg *msg, + bool bound) { struct xe_exec_queue *q = msg->private_data; struct xe_guc *guc = exec_queue_to_guc(q); if (guc_exec_queue_allowed_to_change_state(q) && !exec_queue_suspended(q) && - exec_queue_enabled(q)) { + exec_queue_enabled(q) && bound) { wait_event(guc->ct.wq, vf_recovery(guc) || ((q->guc->resume_time != RESUME_PENDING || xe_guc_read_stopped(guc)) && !exec_queue_pending_disable(q))); @@ -1934,11 +1919,12 @@ static void __guc_exec_queue_process_msg_suspend(struct xe_sched_msg *msg) } } -static void __guc_exec_queue_process_msg_resume(struct xe_sched_msg *msg) +static void __guc_exec_queue_process_msg_resume(struct xe_sched_msg *msg, + bool bound) { struct xe_exec_queue *q = msg->private_data; - if (guc_exec_queue_allowed_to_change_state(q)) { + if (guc_exec_queue_allowed_to_change_state(q) && bound) { clear_exec_queue_suspended(q); if (!exec_queue_enabled(q)) { q->guc->resume_time = RESUME_PENDING; @@ -1950,17 +1936,20 @@ static void __guc_exec_queue_process_msg_resume(struct xe_sched_msg *msg) } } -static void __guc_exec_queue_process_msg_set_multi_queue_priority(struct xe_sched_msg *msg) +static void +__guc_exec_queue_process_msg_set_multi_queue_priority(struct xe_sched_msg *msg, + bool bound) { struct xe_exec_queue *q = msg->private_data; - if (guc_exec_queue_allowed_to_change_state(q)) + if (guc_exec_queue_allowed_to_change_state(q) && bound) guc_exec_queue_send_cgp_sync(q, 0); kfree(msg); } -static void __guc_exec_queue_process_msg_cgp_sync(struct xe_sched_msg *msg) +static void __guc_exec_queue_process_msg_cgp_sync(struct xe_sched_msg *msg, + bool bound) { struct xe_exec_queue *q = msg->private_data; @@ -1969,7 +1958,7 @@ static void __guc_exec_queue_process_msg_cgp_sync(struct xe_sched_msg *msg) * CGP update + CGP_SYNC (re-applies the current priority from * q->multi_queue.priority). */ - if (guc_exec_queue_allowed_to_change_state(q)) + if (guc_exec_queue_allowed_to_change_state(q) && bound) guc_exec_queue_send_cgp_sync(q, 0); } @@ -1982,37 +1971,46 @@ static void __guc_exec_queue_process_msg_cgp_sync(struct xe_sched_msg *msg) #define OPCODE_MASK 0xf #define MSG_LOCKED BIT(8) #define MSG_HEAD BIT(9) +#define MSG_PM_REF BIT(10) static void guc_exec_queue_process_msg(struct xe_sched_msg *msg) { struct xe_device *xe = guc_to_xe(exec_queue_to_guc(msg->private_data)); + int idx; + bool pm_ref = !!(msg->opcode & MSG_PM_REF), + bound = drm_dev_enter(&xe->drm, &idx); trace_xe_sched_msg_recv(msg); - switch (msg->opcode) { + switch (msg->opcode & OPCODE_MASK) { case CLEANUP: - __guc_exec_queue_process_msg_cleanup(msg); + __guc_exec_queue_process_msg_cleanup(msg, bound); break; case SET_SCHED_PROPS: - __guc_exec_queue_process_msg_set_sched_props(msg); + __guc_exec_queue_process_msg_set_sched_props(msg, bound); break; case SUSPEND: - __guc_exec_queue_process_msg_suspend(msg); + __guc_exec_queue_process_msg_suspend(msg, bound); break; case RESUME: - __guc_exec_queue_process_msg_resume(msg); + __guc_exec_queue_process_msg_resume(msg, bound); break; case SET_MULTI_QUEUE_PRIORITY: - __guc_exec_queue_process_msg_set_multi_queue_priority(msg); + __guc_exec_queue_process_msg_set_multi_queue_priority(msg, + bound); break; case CGP_SYNC_MSG: - __guc_exec_queue_process_msg_cgp_sync(msg); + __guc_exec_queue_process_msg_cgp_sync(msg, bound); break; default: XE_WARN_ON("Unknown message type"); } - xe_pm_runtime_put(xe); + if (pm_ref) + xe_pm_runtime_put(xe); + + if (bound) + drm_dev_exit(idx); } static const struct drm_sched_backend_ops drm_sched_ops = { @@ -2137,10 +2135,17 @@ static void guc_exec_queue_kill(struct xe_exec_queue *q) static void guc_exec_queue_add_msg(struct xe_exec_queue *q, struct xe_sched_msg *msg, u32 opcode) { - xe_pm_runtime_get_noresume(guc_to_xe(exec_queue_to_guc(q))); + struct xe_guc *guc = exec_queue_to_guc(q); + struct xe_device *xe = guc_to_xe(guc); + int idx; + bool bound = drm_dev_enter(&xe->drm, &idx); INIT_LIST_HEAD(&msg->link); msg->opcode = opcode & OPCODE_MASK; + if (bound) { + xe_pm_runtime_get_noresume(guc_to_xe(exec_queue_to_guc(q))); + msg->opcode |= MSG_PM_REF; + } msg->private_data = q; trace_xe_sched_msg_add(msg); @@ -2150,6 +2155,9 @@ static void guc_exec_queue_add_msg(struct xe_exec_queue *q, struct xe_sched_msg xe_sched_add_msg_locked(&q->guc->sched, msg); else xe_sched_add_msg(&q->guc->sched, msg); + + if (bound) + drm_dev_exit(idx); } static void guc_exec_queue_try_add_msg_head(struct xe_exec_queue *q, @@ -2182,10 +2190,7 @@ static void guc_exec_queue_destroy(struct xe_exec_queue *q) { struct xe_sched_msg *msg = q->guc->static_msgs + STATIC_MSG_CLEANUP; - if (!(q->flags & EXEC_QUEUE_FLAG_PERMANENT) && !exec_queue_wedged(q)) - guc_exec_queue_add_msg(q, msg, CLEANUP); - else - __guc_exec_queue_destroy(exec_queue_to_guc(q), q); + guc_exec_queue_add_msg(q, msg, CLEANUP); } static int guc_exec_queue_set_priority(struct xe_exec_queue *q, @@ -2650,7 +2655,7 @@ static void guc_exec_queue_stop(struct xe_guc *guc, struct xe_exec_queue *q) } if (do_destroy) - __guc_exec_queue_destroy(guc, q); + guc_exec_queue_destroy_async(q); } static int guc_submit_reset_prepare(struct xe_guc *guc) @@ -3296,7 +3301,7 @@ static void handle_deregister_done(struct xe_guc *guc, struct xe_exec_queue *q) trace_xe_exec_queue_deregister_done(q); clear_exec_queue_registered(q); - __guc_exec_queue_destroy(guc, q); + guc_exec_queue_destroy_async(q); } > Sorry a lot of this stuff in xe_guc_submit.c around corner cases / > teardwons is a mess from early Xe work I did, we should aim to clean > this up with clear semantics. > > Matt > > > Raag > > > > > "Missing outer runtime PM protection\n"); > > > } > > > } > > > -- > > > 2.50.1 > > >