Re: [PATCH] drm/xe: Skip GT TLB invalidation when VM has no queues mapped

"Summers, Stuart" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups org.freedesktop.lists.intel-xe
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Thu, 2026-08-06 at 12:14 -0700, Matthew Brost wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 06, 2026 at 01:04:28PM -0600, Summers, Stuart wrote:
> > On Wed, 2026-08-05 at 20:32 -0700, Matthew Brost wrote:
> > > If no exec queues from a VM are mapped on a GT, issuing a PPGTT
> > > TLB
> > > invalidation for that GT can require an rc6 wake which is
> > > expensive.
> > > 
> > > Skip the media TLB invalidation when the VM has no exec queues
> > > mapped on it. If TLB invalidations are already in-flight on that
> > > GT
> > > we can't break fence ordering, so issue a dummy GGTT invalidation
> > > instead to maintain seqno ordering.
> > > 
> > > This optimization is particularly impactful for SVM workloads
> > > which
> > > may or may not use the media GT. Average TLB invalidation time
> > > drops
> > > from ~75us to ~18us in such benchmarks on certain BMG parts - the
> > > improvement varies based on platform.
> > 
> > Still going through the code changes, but is there a chance we
> > could
> > deregister a context (so no queues exist), then mmap to invalidate,
> > then register a new context and read stale data here? I think in
> > the
> > context invalidation case where we don't have queues we would
> > normally
> > send a full invalidation instead rather than just skipping it. That
> > seems risky...
> 
> We don't call `xe_vm_remove_exec_queue()` until
> `__xe_exec_queue_free()`. The latter is only called after all GuC
> references are gone (i.e., deregistration has completed, or GuC state
> has otherwise been torn down due to PM events or a GT reset).
> Therefore,
> there is no race where we accidentally fail to send a required TLB
> invalidation. If anything, the opposite can happen: we may send an
> unnecessary TLB invalidation.
> 
> We don't need to use the queue reference-counting trick here to
> prevent
> deregistration, because whether a queue is registered is immaterial
> to
> successful TLB invalidation. The interface invalidates an ASID rather
> than the CTXID that the GuC tracks and requires a valid queue.

Ok.. so in the event that something like this does become required, the
expectation is we'd add the required reference counts at that time?

I'm just a little worried we're overoptimising here and will cause some
issues down the road.

Thanks,
Stuart

> 
> So all of this is safe.
> 
> Matt 
> 
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > Stuart
> > 
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Matthew Brost <[email protected]>
> > > 
> > > ---
> > > v2:
> > >  - Make GT generic rather than just media GT (Thomas)
> > >  - Fix accounting bug in empty vs non-empty (CI)
> > > ---
> > >  drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_tlb_inval.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++++--
> > >  drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c            | 12 ++----------
> > >  2 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_tlb_inval.c
> > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_tlb_inval.c
> > > index 046d0655122f..ab04b87cf1c3 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_tlb_inval.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_tlb_inval.c
> > > @@ -205,11 +205,27 @@ static int send_tlb_inval_asid_ppgtt(struct
> > > xe_tlb_inval *tlb_inval, u32 seqno,
> > >                                      struct drm_suballoc *prl_sa)
> > >  {
> > >         struct xe_guc *guc = tlb_inval->private;
> > > +       struct xe_device *xe = guc_to_xe(guc);
> > > +       struct xe_vm *vm;
> > > +       int err, id = guc_to_gt(guc)->info.id;
> > >  
> > >         lockdep_assert_held(&tlb_inval->seqno_lock);
> > >  
> > > -       return send_tlb_inval_ppgtt(guc, seqno, start, end, asid,
> > > -                                  
> > > XE_GUC_TLB_INVAL_PAGE_SELECTIVE,
> > > prl_sa);
> > > +       vm = xe_device_asid_to_vm(xe, asid);
> > > +       if (IS_ERR(vm))
> > > +               return PTR_ERR(vm);
> > > +
> > > +       down_read(&vm->exec_queues.lock);
> > > +       if (!vm->exec_queues.count[id] &&
> > > xe_tlb_inval_idle(tlb_inval))
> > > +               err = -ECANCELED;
> > > +       else
> > > +               err = send_tlb_inval_ppgtt(guc, seqno, start,
> > > end,
> > > asid,
> > > +                                         
> > > XE_GUC_TLB_INVAL_PAGE_SELECTIVE,
> > > +                                          prl_sa);
> > > +       up_read(&vm->exec_queues.lock);
> > > +       xe_vm_put(vm);
> > > +
> > > +       return err;
> > >  }
> > >  
> > >  static int send_tlb_inval_ctx_ppgtt(struct xe_tlb_inval
> > > *tlb_inval,
> > > u32 seqno,
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c
> > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c
> > > index 9e0176861cb6..e2667200462c 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c
> > > @@ -4946,8 +4946,7 @@ int xe_vm_alloc_cpu_addr_mirror_vma(struct
> > > xe_vm *vm, uint64_t start, uint64_t r
> > >   * @vm: The VM.
> > >   * @q: The exec_queue
> > >   *
> > > - * Add exec queue to VM, skipped if the device does not have
> > > context
> > > based TLB
> > > - * invalidations.
> > > + * Add exec queue to VM.
> > >   */
> > >  void xe_vm_add_exec_queue(struct xe_vm *vm, struct xe_exec_queue
> > > *q)
> > >  {
> > > @@ -4961,9 +4960,6 @@ void xe_vm_add_exec_queue(struct xe_vm *vm,
> > > struct xe_exec_queue *q)
> > >         xe_assert(xe, vm->xef);
> > >         xe_assert(xe, vm == q->vm);
> > >  
> > > -       if (!xe->info.has_ctx_tlb_inval)
> > > -               return;
> > > -
> > >         down_write(&vm->exec_queues.lock);
> > >         list_add(&q->vm_exec_queue_link, &vm->exec_queues.list[q-
> > > >gt-
> > > > info.id]);
> > >         ++vm->exec_queues.count[q->gt->info.id];
> > > @@ -4975,14 +4971,10 @@ void xe_vm_add_exec_queue(struct xe_vm
> > > *vm,
> > > struct xe_exec_queue *q)
> > >   * @vm: The VM.
> > >   * @q: The exec_queue
> > >   *
> > > - * Remove exec queue from VM, skipped if the device does not
> > > have
> > > context based
> > > - * TLB invalidations.
> > > + * Remove exec queue from VM.
> > >   */
> > >  void xe_vm_remove_exec_queue(struct xe_vm *vm, struct
> > > xe_exec_queue
> > > *q)
> > >  {
> > > -       if (!vm->xe->info.has_ctx_tlb_inval)
> > > -               return;
> > > -
> > >         down_write(&vm->exec_queues.lock);
> > >         if (!list_empty(&q->vm_exec_queue_link)) {
> > >                 list_del(&q->vm_exec_queue_link);
> >
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.