Re: [PATCH] drm/xe: Skip GT TLB invalidation when VM has no queues mapped
"Summers, Stuart" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | org.freedesktop.lists.intel-xe |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Thu, 2026-08-06 at 12:14 -0700, Matthew Brost wrote: > On Thu, Aug 06, 2026 at 01:04:28PM -0600, Summers, Stuart wrote: > > On Wed, 2026-08-05 at 20:32 -0700, Matthew Brost wrote: > > > If no exec queues from a VM are mapped on a GT, issuing a PPGTT > > > TLB > > > invalidation for that GT can require an rc6 wake which is > > > expensive. > > > > > > Skip the media TLB invalidation when the VM has no exec queues > > > mapped on it. If TLB invalidations are already in-flight on that > > > GT > > > we can't break fence ordering, so issue a dummy GGTT invalidation > > > instead to maintain seqno ordering. > > > > > > This optimization is particularly impactful for SVM workloads > > > which > > > may or may not use the media GT. Average TLB invalidation time > > > drops > > > from ~75us to ~18us in such benchmarks on certain BMG parts - the > > > improvement varies based on platform. > > > > Still going through the code changes, but is there a chance we > > could > > deregister a context (so no queues exist), then mmap to invalidate, > > then register a new context and read stale data here? I think in > > the > > context invalidation case where we don't have queues we would > > normally > > send a full invalidation instead rather than just skipping it. That > > seems risky... > > We don't call `xe_vm_remove_exec_queue()` until > `__xe_exec_queue_free()`. The latter is only called after all GuC > references are gone (i.e., deregistration has completed, or GuC state > has otherwise been torn down due to PM events or a GT reset). > Therefore, > there is no race where we accidentally fail to send a required TLB > invalidation. If anything, the opposite can happen: we may send an > unnecessary TLB invalidation. > > We don't need to use the queue reference-counting trick here to > prevent > deregistration, because whether a queue is registered is immaterial > to > successful TLB invalidation. The interface invalidates an ASID rather > than the CTXID that the GuC tracks and requires a valid queue. Ok.. so in the event that something like this does become required, the expectation is we'd add the required reference counts at that time? I'm just a little worried we're overoptimising here and will cause some issues down the road. Thanks, Stuart > > So all of this is safe. > > Matt > > > > > Thanks, > > Stuart > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Matthew Brost <[email protected]> > > > > > > --- > > > v2: > > > - Make GT generic rather than just media GT (Thomas) > > > - Fix accounting bug in empty vs non-empty (CI) > > > --- > > > drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_tlb_inval.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++++-- > > > drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c | 12 ++---------- > > > 2 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_tlb_inval.c > > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_tlb_inval.c > > > index 046d0655122f..ab04b87cf1c3 100644 > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_tlb_inval.c > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_tlb_inval.c > > > @@ -205,11 +205,27 @@ static int send_tlb_inval_asid_ppgtt(struct > > > xe_tlb_inval *tlb_inval, u32 seqno, > > > struct drm_suballoc *prl_sa) > > > { > > > struct xe_guc *guc = tlb_inval->private; > > > + struct xe_device *xe = guc_to_xe(guc); > > > + struct xe_vm *vm; > > > + int err, id = guc_to_gt(guc)->info.id; > > > > > > lockdep_assert_held(&tlb_inval->seqno_lock); > > > > > > - return send_tlb_inval_ppgtt(guc, seqno, start, end, asid, > > > - > > > XE_GUC_TLB_INVAL_PAGE_SELECTIVE, > > > prl_sa); > > > + vm = xe_device_asid_to_vm(xe, asid); > > > + if (IS_ERR(vm)) > > > + return PTR_ERR(vm); > > > + > > > + down_read(&vm->exec_queues.lock); > > > + if (!vm->exec_queues.count[id] && > > > xe_tlb_inval_idle(tlb_inval)) > > > + err = -ECANCELED; > > > + else > > > + err = send_tlb_inval_ppgtt(guc, seqno, start, > > > end, > > > asid, > > > + > > > XE_GUC_TLB_INVAL_PAGE_SELECTIVE, > > > + prl_sa); > > > + up_read(&vm->exec_queues.lock); > > > + xe_vm_put(vm); > > > + > > > + return err; > > > } > > > > > > static int send_tlb_inval_ctx_ppgtt(struct xe_tlb_inval > > > *tlb_inval, > > > u32 seqno, > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c > > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c > > > index 9e0176861cb6..e2667200462c 100644 > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c > > > @@ -4946,8 +4946,7 @@ int xe_vm_alloc_cpu_addr_mirror_vma(struct > > > xe_vm *vm, uint64_t start, uint64_t r > > > * @vm: The VM. > > > * @q: The exec_queue > > > * > > > - * Add exec queue to VM, skipped if the device does not have > > > context > > > based TLB > > > - * invalidations. > > > + * Add exec queue to VM. > > > */ > > > void xe_vm_add_exec_queue(struct xe_vm *vm, struct xe_exec_queue > > > *q) > > > { > > > @@ -4961,9 +4960,6 @@ void xe_vm_add_exec_queue(struct xe_vm *vm, > > > struct xe_exec_queue *q) > > > xe_assert(xe, vm->xef); > > > xe_assert(xe, vm == q->vm); > > > > > > - if (!xe->info.has_ctx_tlb_inval) > > > - return; > > > - > > > down_write(&vm->exec_queues.lock); > > > list_add(&q->vm_exec_queue_link, &vm->exec_queues.list[q- > > > >gt- > > > > info.id]); > > > ++vm->exec_queues.count[q->gt->info.id]; > > > @@ -4975,14 +4971,10 @@ void xe_vm_add_exec_queue(struct xe_vm > > > *vm, > > > struct xe_exec_queue *q) > > > * @vm: The VM. > > > * @q: The exec_queue > > > * > > > - * Remove exec queue from VM, skipped if the device does not > > > have > > > context based > > > - * TLB invalidations. > > > + * Remove exec queue from VM. > > > */ > > > void xe_vm_remove_exec_queue(struct xe_vm *vm, struct > > > xe_exec_queue > > > *q) > > > { > > > - if (!vm->xe->info.has_ctx_tlb_inval) > > > - return; > > > - > > > down_write(&vm->exec_queues.lock); > > > if (!list_empty(&q->vm_exec_queue_link)) { > > > list_del(&q->vm_exec_queue_link); > >