Re: [PATCH v3 12/23] drm/xe/ras: Check RAS and LOG component definitions
"Mallesh, Koujalagi" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | org.freedesktop.lists.intel-xe |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 30-07-2026 08:51 pm, Michal Wajdeczko wrote: > While not strictly required, we want to make sure that components > definitions used by the RAS firmware are in the same fixed relation > with HW components definitions used by the LOG infrastructure to > allow code simplification. Add static asserts to enforce that. > > Signed-off-by: Michal Wajdeczko <[email protected]> LGTM, Reviewed-by: Mallesh Koujalagi <[email protected]> > Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <[email protected]> > Cc: Aravind Iddamsetty <[email protected]> > --- > Cc: Mallesh Koujalagi <[email protected]> > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_ras.c | 11 +++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_ras.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_ras.c > index a31e06b8aa67..56c0c31e46fb 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_ras.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_ras.c > @@ -5,6 +5,7 @@ > > #include "xe_device.h" > #include "xe_drm_ras.h" > +#include "xe_log.h" > #include "xe_pm.h" > #include "xe_printk.h" > #include "xe_ras.h" > @@ -45,6 +46,16 @@ enum xe_ras_component { > XE_RAS_COMP_MAX > }; > > +#define CHECK_COMPONENT(RAS_COMP, LOG_COMP) \ > + static_assert(MAKE_XE_LOG_COMPONENT(HARDWARE, (RAS_COMP)) == (LOG_COMP)) > + /* make sure components definitions maintain stable relation */ > + CHECK_COMPONENT(XE_RAS_COMP_DEVICE_MEMORY, XE_LOG_COMPONENT_DEVMEM); > + CHECK_COMPONENT(XE_RAS_COMP_CORE_COMPUTE, XE_LOG_COMPONENT_HWCORE); > + CHECK_COMPONENT(XE_RAS_COMP_PCIE, XE_LOG_COMPONENT_PCIE); > + CHECK_COMPONENT(XE_RAS_COMP_FABRIC, XE_LOG_COMPONENT_FABRIC); > + CHECK_COMPONENT(XE_RAS_COMP_SOC_INTERNAL, XE_LOG_COMPONENT_SOC); > +#undef CHECK_COMPONENT > + > /* RAS response status codes */ > enum xe_ras_response_status { > XE_RAS_STATUS_SUCCESS = 0,