Re: [PATCH 3/4] drm/xe/pcode: Report pcode errors using SIGID
"Nilawar, Badal" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | org.freedesktop.lists.intel-xe |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi Umesh, On 12-08-2026 05:22, Umesh Nerlige Ramappa wrote: > Use xe_log_err() to report pcode errors using SIGID. > > Signed-off-by: Umesh Nerlige Ramappa <[email protected]> > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pcode.c | 12 +++++++----- > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pcode.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pcode.c > index e9125341481b..b35c1a77effd 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pcode.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pcode.c > @@ -14,6 +14,7 @@ > #include "regs/xe_pmt.h" > #include "xe_assert.h" > #include "xe_device.h" > +#include "xe_log.h" > #include "xe_mmio.h" > #include "xe_pcode_api.h" > #include "xe_pm.h" > @@ -61,9 +62,7 @@ static int pcode_mailbox_status(struct xe_tile *tile) > } > > if (err) { > - drm_err(&tile_to_xe(tile)->drm, "PCODE Mailbox failed: %d %s", > - err_decode, err_str); > - > + xe_log_err(tile, PCODE, err_decode, "Mailbox failed: %s\n", err_str); > return err_decode; > } > > @@ -225,6 +224,9 @@ int xe_pcode_request(struct xe_tile *tile, u32 mbox, u32 request, > true, 50 * 1000, true); > preempt_enable(); > > + if (!status && ret) > + xe_log_err(tile, PCODE, ret, "Request timed out on retry"); > + > out: > mutex_unlock(&tile->pcode.lock); > return status ? status : ret; > @@ -319,8 +321,8 @@ int xe_pcode_ready(struct xe_device *xe, bool locked) > mutex_unlock(&tile->pcode.lock); > > if (ret) > - drm_err(&xe->drm, > - "PCODE initialization timedout after: 3 min\n"); > + xe_log_err(xe, PCODE, -ret, > + "Initialization timed out after: %d min\n", timeout_us / 60000000); Is a SIGID needed here? My understanding is that this failure is translated into survivability mode, at least during probe. Also is it correct to log CPER_SEV_RECOVERABLE for this error? Thanks, Badal > > return ret; > }