Re: [PATCH v4 30/32] drm/xe/gt: Report 'Fault response' pagefault error using SIGID
Michal Wajdeczko <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | org.freedesktop.lists.intel-xe |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 8/13/2026 8:37 PM, Rodrigo Vivi wrote: > On Wed, Aug 12, 2026 at 09:14:46PM +0200, Michal Wajdeczko wrote: >> Report 'Unsuccessful response' error using xe_log_err() helper. >> >> Signed-off-by: Michal Wajdeczko <[email protected]> >> Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <[email protected]> >> Cc: Matthew Brost <[email protected]> >> Cc: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <[email protected]> >> Cc: Aravind Iddamsetty <[email protected]> >> Cc: Mallesh Koujalagi <[email protected]> >> --- >> v2: rebased (Michal) reword message (Mallesh) >> --- >> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pagefault.c | 4 ++-- >> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pagefault.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pagefault.c >> index 7e829c61387f..eb600c466187 100644 >> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pagefault.c >> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pagefault.c >> @@ -14,6 +14,7 @@ >> #include "xe_gt_types.h" >> #include "xe_gt_stats.h" >> #include "xe_hw_engine.h" >> +#include "xe_log.h" >> #include "xe_pagefault.h" >> #include "xe_pagefault_types.h" >> #include "xe_svm.h" >> @@ -625,8 +626,7 @@ static void xe_pagefault_queue_work(struct work_struct *w) >> xe_pagefault_save_to_vm(gt_to_xe(gt), pf); >> xe_pagefault_cache_start_invalidate(cache_start); >> xe_pagefault_print(pf); >> - xe_gt_info(pf->gt, "Fault response: Unsuccessful %pe\n", >> - ERR_PTR(err)); >> + xe_log_err(pf->gt, PAGEFAULT, err, "Unsuccessful response\n"); > > I'm wondering if we should really go from info to err here... my question was different: "why this err is only reported as info level?" as once we hit this condition we also print large dump (see xe_pagefault_print) likely for debug/diagnostics so it seems important @Matthew, comments? > > Why not staying with xe_log_info or now? I can change that for xe_log_info, but then (by design) we will not print an error > > But also, why err and not ERR_PTR(err)? patch 10/32 [1] introduced helpers that take just errno value and convert that into data { ERR_PTR(err), 0 } pair [1] https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/745993/?series=171022&rev=4 > >> } else { >> xe_gt_stats_incr(pf->gt, XE_GT_STATS_ID_INVALID_PREFETCH_PAGEFAULT_COUNT, 1); >> xe_gt_dbg(pf->gt, "Prefetch Fault response: Unsuccessful %pe\n", >> -- >> 2.47.1 >>