Re: ✗ Xe.CI.FULL: failure for drm/xe/guc: h andle exec queue teardown after hot-unplug

"Gote, Nitin R" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups org.freedesktop.lists.intel-xe
Message-ID <SA3PR11MB8118C82A655F20C94F76525BD0DA2@SA3PR11MB8118.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Hi CI Infra,
The reported failure is not caused by my patch.
I manually verified that igt@xe_pat@pat-index-auto@blt passes with my patch applied.

Thanks,
Nitin

________________________________
From: Patchwork <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, August 11, 2026 8:20 PM
To: Gote, Nitin R <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected] <[email protected]>
Subject: ✗ Xe.CI.FULL: failure for drm/xe/guc: handle exec queue teardown after hot-unplug

Patch Details
Series:
drm/xe/guc: handle exec queue teardown after hot-unplug
URL:
https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/171989/
State:
failure
Details:
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/intel-xe/xe-pw-171989v1/index.html
CI Bug Log - changes from xe-5575-dc462ab791b686c48545c160ecc81be64f77a846_FULL -> xe-pw-171989v1_FULL
Summary

FAILURE

Serious unknown changes coming with xe-pw-171989v1_FULL absolutely need to be
verified manually.

If you think the reported changes have nothing to do with the changes
introduced in xe-pw-171989v1_FULL, please notify your bug team ([email protected]) to allow them
to document this new failure mode, which will reduce false positives in CI.

Participating hosts (2 -> 2)

No changes in participating hosts

Possible new issues

Here are the unknown changes that may have been introduced in xe-pw-171989v1_FULL:

IGT changes
Possible regressions

  *   igt@xe_pat@pat-index-auto@blt:
     *   shard-lnl: PASS<https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/intel-xe/xe-5575-dc462ab791b686c48545c160ecc81be64f77a846/shard-lnl-8/igt@xe_pat@[email protected]> -> INCOMPLETE<https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/intel-xe/xe-pw-171989v1/shard-lnl-7/igt@xe_pat@[email protected]> +1 other test incomplete
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.