Re: [PATCH v4 23/32] drm/xe/survivability: Report 'Runtime Mode enabled' status using SIGID
Michal Wajdeczko <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | org.freedesktop.lists.intel-xe |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 8/14/2026 3:00 PM, Mallesh, Koujalagi wrote: > > On 14-08-2026 12:36 pm, Tauro, Riana wrote: >> >> >> On 13-08-2026 18:16, Michal Wajdeczko wrote: >>> >>> On 8/13/2026 1:40 PM, Mallesh, Koujalagi wrote: >>>> On 13-08-2026 12:44 am, Michal Wajdeczko wrote: >>>>> Report 'Runtime Mode' status using various xe_log() helpers. >>>>> >>>>> Signed-off-by: Michal Wajdeczko <[email protected]> >>>>> Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <[email protected]> >>>>> Cc: Riana Tauro <[email protected]> >>>>> Cc: Aravind Iddamsetty <[email protected]> >>>>> Cc: Mallesh Koujalagi <[email protected]> >>>>> --- >>>>> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_survivability_mode.c | 10 +++++++--- >>>>> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) >>>>> >>>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_survivability_mode.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_survivability_mode.c >>>>> index ebd288986c11..5d3315ac735c 100644 >>>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_survivability_mode.c >>>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_survivability_mode.c >>>>> @@ -18,6 +18,7 @@ >>>>> #include "xe_mmio.h" >>>>> #include "xe_nvm.h" >>>>> #include "xe_pcode_api.h" >>>>> +#include "xe_printk.h" >>>>> #include "xe_vsec.h" >>>>> /** >>>>> @@ -405,7 +406,7 @@ void xe_survivability_mode_runtime_enable(struct xe_device *xe) >>>>> struct pci_dev *pdev = to_pci_dev(xe->drm.dev); >>>>> if (!IS_DGFX(xe) || IS_SRIOV_VF(xe) || xe->info.platform < XE_BATTLEMAGE) { >>>>> - dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Runtime Survivability Mode not supported\n"); >>>>> + xe_log_err(xe, SURVIVABILITY, -EOPNOTSUPP, "Runtime Mode not supported!\n"); >>>>> return; >>>>> } >>>>> @@ -413,11 +414,14 @@ void xe_survivability_mode_runtime_enable(struct xe_device *xe) >>>>> create_survivability_sysfs(pdev); >>>>> survivability->type = XE_SURVIVABILITY_TYPE_RUNTIME; >>>>> - dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Runtime Survivability mode enabled\n"); >>>>> + xe_log_info(xe, SURVIVABILITY, "Runtime Mode enabled!\n"); >> >> This should be xe_log_err >>>>> xe_device_set_wedged_method(xe, DRM_WEDGE_RECOVERY_VENDOR); >>>>> xe_device_declare_wedged(xe); >>>>> - dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Firmware flash required, Please refer to the userspace documentation for more details!\n"); >>>>> + >>>>> + xe_log_info(xe, SURVIVABILITY, "Firmware flash required!\n"); >>>> IMO, we need to use xe_log_err (recoverable) here instead of xe_log_info. >> >> Same here. >> >>>> >>>> Already mentioned in original changes [1], runtime firmware errors cause device unstable: >>>> >>>> [1] https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/tip/-/commit/a2ca0633a0fef925a0d8125d8f3e4495a5ecb310 >>> but in recent comment [2] you said that Arch team wanted that to be logged as info rather than fatal >>> >>> [2] https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/743324/?series=171022&rev=3#comment_1373731 >>> >>> @Riana, @Rodrigo, @Aravind ? >>> >>> I need a decider here >>> >>>> >>>> As I know xe_survivability_mode_runtime_enable function need to carry errno as parameter to pass into xe_log_err, >>>> >>>> however we need to create separate refactor patch for that in future. >> >> Why do we need error no here? It should be 0. > > To pass correct errno to SIGID helper function. > > btw, for that we need refactor code, which we can handle in future. > > > @Michal > > Please post complete code to check. but errno-only SIGID helpers already support 0 as err in such case, there will be just no "(%pe)" emitted similar to what we have in case of info level helper what refactor/complete code do you want here? > > > Thanks, > > -/Mallesh > > >> >> Thanks >> Riana >> >> >>>> >>>> >>>> With above changes: >>>> >>>> Reviewed-by: Mallesh Koujalagi <[email protected]> >>>> >>>>> + xe_info(xe, "Please refer to the userspace documentation for more details how to flash the firmware on %s!\n", >>>>> + xe->info.platform_name); >>>>> } >>>>> static void log_survivability_info(struct xe_device *xe)