Re: [PATCH v2] drm/xe/guc: Fix race around q->guc->suspend_pending access
Matthew Brost <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | org.freedesktop.lists.intel-xe |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Wed, Aug 19, 2026 at 02:38:39AM +0800, Jagmeet Randhawa wrote: This is designed to be lockless. > q->guc->suspend_pending is accessed without any common lock. > __suspend_fence_signal(), called from guc_exec_queue_kill() and the This is actually the problem. __suspend_fence_signal shouldn't be called from guc_exec_queue_kill(). This can prematurely signal a suspend fence while the hardware is still executing. __suspend_fence_signal should be called in two possible places: - Naturally in G2H handler (handle_sched_done) - Or in global event that takes down the GuC firmware (guc_exec_queue_stop) With that, a lock isn't need because the state machine / firmware interaction ensures everything is race free. So I think the solution is ensure __suspend_fence_signal is called in the correct places rather than adding protection via a lock. Matt > suspend-timeout ban path, clears the flag asynchronously. Meanwhile > handle_sched_done(), guc_exec_queue_stop() and > __guc_exec_queue_process_msg_suspend() check the flag and then call > suspend_fence_signal(), which asserts that it is still set. > > As the check and suspend_fence_signal() are not atomic, the clear can > land in between and trip the xe_gt_assert(q->guc->suspend_pending). > > The flag is already set and read under the per-queue msg_lock > (xe_sched_msg_lock()) on the suspend and resume paths. Extend that same > lock to the clear paths (kill and ban) and to the three check-then-act > sites so the check and the signal are atomic with respect to the clear. > In __guc_exec_queue_process_msg_suspend() only the non-sleeping branch is > wrapped, since the other branch waits. In handle_sched_done() the flag is > snapshotted under the lock and deregister_exec_queue() is kept outside it. > > v2: Document that sched->msg_lock also protects > guc->suspend_pending, which indicates a suspend message is in > flight, in addition to the sched->msgs list (Niranjana) > > Signed-off-by: Jagmeet Randhawa <[email protected]> > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gpu_scheduler_types.h | 5 +++- > drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_exec_queue_types.h | 5 +++- > drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_submit.c | 29 ++++++++++++++++---- > 3 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gpu_scheduler_types.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gpu_scheduler_types.h > index 63d9bf92583c..78ef2e8ded4f 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gpu_scheduler_types.h > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gpu_scheduler_types.h > @@ -47,7 +47,10 @@ struct xe_gpu_scheduler { > const struct xe_sched_backend_ops *ops; > /** @msgs: list of messages to be processed in @work_process_msg */ > struct list_head msgs; > - /** @msg_lock: Message lock */ > + /** > + * @msg_lock: Protects @msgs and guc->suspend_pending (indicates a > + * suspend message is in flight) of exec queues on this scheduler. > + */ > spinlock_t msg_lock; > /** @work_process_msg: processes messages */ > struct work_struct work_process_msg; > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_exec_queue_types.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_exec_queue_types.h > index d27826b36649..74b711abe257 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_exec_queue_types.h > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_exec_queue_types.h > @@ -52,7 +52,10 @@ struct xe_guc_exec_queue { > u16 id; > /** @suspend_wait: wait queue used to wait on pending suspends */ > wait_queue_head_t suspend_wait; > - /** @suspend_pending: a suspend of the exec_queue is pending */ > + /** > + * @suspend_pending: a suspend of the exec_queue is pending. > + * Protected by @sched.msg_lock. > + */ > bool suspend_pending; > /** > * @suspend_count: Reference count of active suspend requests. The > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_submit.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_submit.c > index 9036f89dff7d..c565c1d32d3a 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_submit.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_submit.c > @@ -1928,9 +1928,13 @@ static void __guc_exec_queue_process_msg_suspend(struct xe_sched_msg *msg) > set_exec_queue_suspended(q); > disable_scheduling(q, false); > } > - } else if (q->guc->suspend_pending) { > - set_exec_queue_suspended(q); > - suspend_fence_signal(q); > + } else { > + xe_sched_msg_lock(&q->guc->sched); > + if (q->guc->suspend_pending) { > + set_exec_queue_suspended(q); > + suspend_fence_signal(q); > + } > + xe_sched_msg_unlock(&q->guc->sched); > } > } > > @@ -2130,7 +2134,9 @@ static void guc_exec_queue_kill(struct xe_exec_queue *q) > { > trace_xe_exec_queue_kill(q); > set_exec_queue_killed(q); > + xe_sched_msg_lock(&q->guc->sched); > __suspend_fence_signal(q); > + xe_sched_msg_unlock(&q->guc->sched); > xe_guc_exec_queue_trigger_cleanup(q); > } > > @@ -2392,11 +2398,15 @@ static void guc_exec_queue_suspend_timeout_ban(struct xe_exec_queue *q) > */ > if (xe_exec_queue_is_multi_queue(q)) { > set_exec_queue_group_banned(q); > + xe_sched_msg_lock(&q->guc->sched); > __suspend_fence_signal(q); > + xe_sched_msg_unlock(&q->guc->sched); > xe_guc_exec_queue_group_trigger_cleanup(q); > } else { > set_exec_queue_banned(q); > + xe_sched_msg_lock(&q->guc->sched); > __suspend_fence_signal(q); > + xe_sched_msg_unlock(&q->guc->sched); > xe_guc_exec_queue_trigger_cleanup(q); > } > } > @@ -2614,10 +2624,12 @@ static void guc_exec_queue_stop(struct xe_guc *guc, struct xe_exec_queue *q) > if (exec_queue_destroyed(q)) > do_destroy = true; > } > + xe_sched_msg_lock(sched); > if (q->guc->suspend_pending) { > set_exec_queue_suspended(q); > suspend_fence_signal(q); > } > + xe_sched_msg_unlock(sched); > atomic_and(EXEC_QUEUE_STATE_WEDGED | EXEC_QUEUE_STATE_BANNED | > EXEC_QUEUE_STATE_KILLED | EXEC_QUEUE_STATE_DESTROYED | > EXEC_QUEUE_STATE_SUSPENDED, > @@ -3222,13 +3234,20 @@ static void handle_sched_done(struct xe_guc *guc, struct xe_exec_queue *q, > smp_wmb(); > wake_up_all(&guc->ct.wq); > } else { > + bool was_pending; > + > xe_gt_assert(guc_to_gt(guc), runnable_state == 0); > xe_gt_assert(guc_to_gt(guc), exec_queue_pending_disable(q)); > > - if (q->guc->suspend_pending) { > + xe_sched_msg_lock(&q->guc->sched); > + was_pending = q->guc->suspend_pending; > + if (was_pending) { > clear_exec_queue_pending_disable(q); > suspend_fence_signal(q); > - } else { > + } > + xe_sched_msg_unlock(&q->guc->sched); > + > + if (!was_pending) { > if (exec_queue_banned(q)) { > smp_wmb(); > wake_up_all(&guc->ct.wq); > -- > 2.53.0 >