Re: [PATCH v2 01/13] mm: introduce vma_flags_can_grow() and vma_can_grow()
"Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)" <[email protected]> Wed, 22 Jul 2026 15:26:25 +0200
| Newsgroups | org.freedesktop.lists.nouveau,dev.linux.lists.virtualization,org.freedesktop.lists.dri-devel,org.freedesktop.lists.intel-gfx,org.freedesktop.lists.intel-xe,org.kernel.vger.linux-arm-msm,org.kernel.vger.linux-fbdev,org.kernel.vger.linux-fsdevel,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel,org.kernel.vger.linux-mips,org.kernel.vger.linux-samsung-soc,org.kernel.vger.linux-sound,org.kernel.vger.linux-tegra,org.kvack.linux-mm,org.ozlabs.lists.linuxppc-dev,org.xenproject.lists.xen-devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 7/11/26 20:44, Lorenzo Stoakes wrote: > These test whether the VMA has stack semantics, i.e. is able to grow > upwards or downwards depending on the architecture. > > In order to account for arches which do not support upward-growing stacks, > introduce VMA_GROWSUP whose definition depends on the architecture > supporting it, and use vma_flags_test_single_mask() in vma_flags_can_grow() > to account for this. > > No functional change intended. > > Reviewed-by: Zi Yan <[email protected]> > Reviewed-by: Lance Yang <[email protected]> > Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Stoakes <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Vlastimil Babka (SUSE) <[email protected]>