Re: [RFC PATCH 2/2] wifi: ath10k: only wait for response to SET_KEY

Jeff Johnson <[email protected]>
Newsgroups org.infradead.lists.ath10k,org.kernel.vger.linux-wireless
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On 2/11/2026 6:11 PM, James Prestwood wrote:
> On 2/9/26 6:12 PM, Richard Acayan wrote:
>> When sending DELETE_KEY, the driver times out waiting for a response
>> that doesn't come. Only wait for a response when sending SET_KEY.
> 
> We've run into the exact same thing on the QCA6174 and have been 
> carrying an identical patch to this for at least a year.
> 
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-wireless/[email protected]/

Baochen,
Were we ever able to reproduce this?
Do we normally always get a response to DELETE_KEY but in some instances it
comes very late (or not at all)?
If we remove the wait, is there any concern that a late arriving DELETE_KEY
response might be processed as a response to a subsequent SET_KEY command?

/jeff
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.