Re: [PATCH 0/2] wifi: ath: Use static calibration variant table for devicetree platforms
Baochen Qiang <[email protected]> Wed, 8 Apr 2026 14:06:00 +0800
| Newsgroups | org.infradead.lists.ath10k,org.infradead.lists.ath11k,org.infradead.lists.ath12k,org.kernel.vger.linux-devicetree,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel,org.kernel.vger.linux-wireless |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 11/25/2025 5:57 PM, Ernest Van Hoecke wrote: > On Tue, Nov 18, 2025 at 12:23:20PM +0530, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote: >> >> ath12k doesn't seem to require a calibration variant. But even if the user >> replaces ath11k chipset with ath10k one, the calibration variant should be the >> same as it is platform specific except for WSI. >> >> - Mani >> >> -- >> மணிவண்ணன் சதாசிவம் >> > > Hi all, > > Jumping in on this thread to ask about how we should handle variants. > > We are using the WCN7850 device with the ath12k driver and received three > board files for this from Silex, signed by Qualcomm. All three support the > same board (SX-PCEBE), where one is the board file to be used for the > US/EU/JP and the other two are one for higher emissions in the UK/CA and > one for lower emissions in the UK/CA. > > Since these are needed for regulatory differences but support the same > board, we were wondering about your views on how to handle that in > mainline. I see that there is no support for the board file selection in > the device tree for ath12k, and that there is some discussion on how to > handle variants in general. We are using a device tree-based setup and no > ACPI. does your machine has different 'model' property for different BDFs ? does the existing ath11k 'calibration' property based mechanism satisfy your requirement? > > Thanks! > > Kind regards, > Ernest