Re: pull-request: ath-next-20260721
Johannes Berg <[email protected]> Wed, 22 Jul 2026 17:54:02 +0200
| Newsgroups | org.infradead.lists.ath10k,org.infradead.lists.ath11k,org.infradead.lists.ath12k,org.kernel.vger.linux-wireless |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Wed, 2026-07-22 at 08:51 -0700, Jeff Johnson wrote: > On 7/22/2026 7:08 AM, Johannes Berg wrote: > > On Tue, 2026-07-21 at 16:46 -0700, Jeff Johnson wrote: > > >=20 > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > > >=20 > > > NOTE TO UPSTREAM MAINTAINERS > > > This PR includes the merge of an immutable branch from the qcom tree > > > https://lore.kernel.org/all/178362521364.2422497.1305957434056184382.= [email protected]/ > >=20 > > That's annoying, it added a kernel-doc warning that now shows up on our > > output... I guess we need to ignore that. > >=20 > > > New warnings added: > > > Warning: drivers/firmware/qcom/qcom_scm.c:1055 No description found f= or return value of 'qcom_scm_is_pas_available' > > > Warning: drivers/firmware/qcom/qcom_scm.c:1055 No description found f= or return value of 'qcom_scm_is_pas_available' > > > Per-file breakdown: > > > 2 drivers/firmware/qcom/qcom_scm.c >=20 > :( >=20 > I run kernel-doc on the patches I process, but since I didn't directly pr= ocess > that series I didn't see it. Yeah, no worries. Also they're outside our normal set of files, so I saw them only because of the diff, not in my normal "check everything" process. I'm not really bothered by it, just a heads-up. > > Note that the first of those ... the commit exists, but not in the righ= t > > tree. It's in some ath12k-bringup-start tag in your tree, but not in > > mainline, got a different sha1 there. So checking locally is confusing. >=20 > Let me rewrite those and send another PR Thanks! johannes