Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] Use the QMI service IDs from the QMI header
Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | org.infradead.lists.ath11k,org.infradead.lists.ath10k,org.infradead.lists.ath12k,org.kernel.vger.linux-arm-msm,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel,org.kernel.vger.linux-remoteproc,org.kernel.vger.linux-sound,org.kernel.vger.linux-wireless,org.kernel.vger.netdev |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <2026031717-ethanol-zoning-80b5@gregkh> |
On Tue, Mar 17, 2026 at 09:51:32AM +0100, Daniel Lezcano wrote: > On 3/17/26 01:22, Jakub Kicinski wrote: > > On Mon, 16 Mar 2026 18:14:10 +0100 Daniel Lezcano wrote: > > > This series is based on the immutable branch [1] containing the QMI > > > service id definitions along with some drivers using them. > > > > > > How a patch can be merged ? > > > > Wait for the dependency to appear in respective trees after the merge > > window then repost the patches individually. I'm starting to get > > annoyed with all this cross-tree QMI/MHI noise. > > An ack is simpler for everyone, especially when they are trivial Why isn't this 4 different patches, all for different branches/trees as there does not seem to be any dependencies here? confused, greg k-h