Re: [PATCH v2 6/8] wifi: ath12k: Use pci_{enable/disable}_link_state() APIs to enable/disable ASPM states

Ilpo Järvinen <[email protected]>
Newsgroups org.infradead.lists.ath11k,org.infradead.lists.ath10k,org.infradead.lists.ath12k,org.kernel.vger.linux-arm-msm,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel,org.kernel.vger.linux-pci,org.kernel.vger.linux-wireless
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Tue, 26 Aug 2025, Jeff Johnson wrote:

> On 8/25/2025 10:44 AM, Manivannan Sadhasivam via B4 Relay wrote:
> > --- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath12k/Kconfig
> > +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath12k/Kconfig
> > @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
> >  # SPDX-License-Identifier: BSD-3-Clause-Clear
> >  config ATH12K
> >  	tristate "Qualcomm Technologies Wi-Fi 7 support (ath12k)"
> > -	depends on MAC80211 && HAS_DMA && PCI
> > +	depends on MAC80211 && HAS_DMA && PCI && PCIEASPM
> 
> As you point out in patch 1/8, PCIEASPM is protected by EXPERT.
> 
> Won't this prevent the driver from being built (or even showing up in
> menuconfig) if EXPERT is not enabled?

It doesn't work that way, PCIEASPM defaults to y:

$ sed -i -e 's|CONFIG_PCIEASPM=y|CONFIG_PCIEASPM=n|g' .config && make oldconfig && grep -e 'CONFIG_EXPERT ' -e 'CONFIG_PCIEASPM=' .config
#
# configuration written to .config
#
# CONFIG_EXPERT is not set
CONFIG_PCIEASPM=y

> Should we consider having a separate CONFIG item that is used to protect just
> the PCI ASPM interfaces? And then we could split out the ath12k_pci_aspm
> functions into a separate file that is conditionally built based upon that
> config item?
> 
> Or am I too paranoid since everyone enables EXPERT?

One just cannot control PCIEASPM value if EXPERT is not set. ASPM is 
expected to be enabled, or "experts" get to keep the pieces.

-- 
 i.
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.