Re: [RFC PATCH] ath11k: add ath11k_mac_op_flush_sta to properly flush pending packets
Florian Maurer <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | org.infradead.lists.ath11k,org.kernel.vger.linux-wireless |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <GV1P250MB14333099108FC4461F201AE3E8E0A@GV1P250MB1433.EURP250.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> |
On Tue, 2025-10-07 at 14:38 +0200, Sebastian Gottschall wrote: > Am 07.10.2025 um 10:11 schrieb Florian Maurer: > > > When a STA is marked as no longer authorized, if the driver doesn't > > implement flush_sta(), mac80211 calls ieee80211_flush_queues() to > > flush hardware queues to avoid sending unencrypted frames. > > > > This has became a problem for ath11k because ieee80211_flush_queues() > > will stop all traffic and call ath11k_flush, which waits until the > > whole HW queue is empty. In a busy environment this will trigger a > > timeout warning and stalls other STAs. > > > > Fix this by implementing flush_sta method using WMI command to flush > > frames of a specific STA. > > Flushed frames will be marked as discard in tx complete indication. > > > > warning print "ath11k c000000.wifi: failed to flush transmit queue 0" > > was observed on various openwrt devices, and is fixed through this patch. > > > > Signed-off-by: Florian Maurer <[email protected]> > > Tested-by: Florian Maurer <[email protected]> > > Co-authored-by: Benjamin Berg <[email protected]> > > Tested-by: Flole <[email protected]> > > --- > > We tested this patch and it solved the problem of flushing the transmit > > queues taking too long when the AP is busy. > > We did not confirm if this flush is implemented to guarantee that no > > unencrypted frames are sent out on station removal. > > Could someone with more knowledge about the firmware behavior check > > wether this approach is feasible or if a different approach should be > > taken. > > It is not clear to me if the approach taken in "wifi: ath10k: Flush > > only requested txq in ath10k_flush()" might be better. > > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-wireless/01d859e8e574a1f5d0b916333fe0b5cda859af9b.1732293922.git.repk@triplefau.lt/ > > > > Regards > > Florian > > > > drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath11k/mac.c | 19 +++++++++++++++++++ > > 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath11k/mac.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath11k/mac.c > > index 106e2530b64e..a94649edd4ed 100644 > > --- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath11k/mac.c > > +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath11k/mac.c > > @@ -8330,6 +8330,24 @@ static void ath11k_mac_op_flush(struct ieee80211_hw *hw, struct ieee80211_vif *v > > ath11k_mac_flush_tx_complete(ar); > > } > > > > +static void ath11k_mac_op_flush_sta(struct ieee80211_hw *hw, > > + struct ieee80211_vif *vif, > > + struct ieee80211_sta *sta) > > +{ > > + struct ath11k_vif *arvif = (void *)vif->drv_priv; > > + struct ath11k *ar = hw->priv; > > + struct peer_flush_params params = { > > + .peer_tid_bitmap = 0xFF, > > + .vdev_id = arvif->vdev_id, > > + }; > > + int ret = 0; > > + > > + ret = ath11k_wmi_send_peer_flush_tids_cmd(ar, sta->addr, ¶ms); > > + if (ret) > > + ath11k_warn(ar->ab, "failed to flush sta (sta %pM)\n", > > + sta->addr); > > +} > > + > > static bool > > ath11k_mac_has_single_legacy_rate(struct ath11k *ar, > > enum nl80211_band band, > > @@ -9920,6 +9938,7 @@ static const struct ieee80211_ops ath11k_ops = { > > .set_bitrate_mask = ath11k_mac_op_set_bitrate_mask, > > .get_survey = ath11k_mac_op_get_survey, > > .flush = ath11k_mac_op_flush, > > + .flush_sta = ath11k_mac_op_flush_sta, > > .sta_statistics = ath11k_mac_op_sta_statistics, > > CFG80211_TESTMODE_CMD(ath11k_tm_cmd) > > > why is peer_tid_bitmap 0xff instead of 0xffffffff? When setting it to 0xffffffff it fails with: Assertion !CHK_TID_FLG(ptid, WAL_TID_IN_SCHEDQ) failedparam0 :zero, param1 :zero, param2 :zero. leading to a device reboot. See: https://github.com/openwrt/openwrt/pull/20293#issuecomment-3367037471 It works with 0xffff though, but I don't quite know what the firmware does/expects here. Maybe someone with more information can help.