Re: [PATCH v3] wifi: ath11k: move .max_tx_ring to struct ath11k_hw_hal_params

"Alex G." <[email protected]>
Newsgroups org.infradead.lists.ath11k,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel,org.kernel.vger.linux-wireless
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Wednesday, January 14, 2026 3:59:09 PM CST Jeff Johnson wrote:
> On 1/14/2026 1:29 PM, Alex G. wrote:
> > On Wednesday, January 14, 2026 11:24:19 AM CST Jeff Johnson wrote:
> >> On 1/12/2026 11:00 PM, Vasanthakumar Thiagarajan wrote:
> >>> On 12/28/2025 8:44 PM, Alexandru Gagniuc wrote:
> >>>> ".max_tx_ring" is an upper bounds to indexing ".tcl2wbm_rbm_map". It
> >>>> is initialized in, core.c, a different file than the array. This
> >>>> spaghetti-like relation is fragile and not obvious. Accidentally
> >>>> setting ".max_tx_ring" too high leads to a hard to track out-of-
> >>>> bounds access and memory corruption.
> >>>> 
> >>>> There is a small ambiguity on the meaning of "max_tx_ring":
> >>>>   - The highest ring, max=3 implies there are 4 rings (0, 1, 2, 3)
> >>>>   - The highest number to use for array indexing (there are 3 rings)
> >>>> 
> >>>> Clarify this dependency by moving ".max_tx_ring" adjacent to the array
> >>>> ".tcl2wbm_rbm_map", and name it "num_tx_rings". Use ARRAY_SIZE()
> >>>> instead of #defines to initialize the length field.
> >>>> 
> >>>> The ath11k_hw_hal_params_qca6390 uses fewer num_tx_rings than its map,
> >>>> so use a constant to express the correct value. Add a static_assert()
> >>>> to fail compilation if the constant is accidentally set too high.
> >>> 
> >>> Text related to static_assert to be removed accordingly.
> > 
> > Hi Jeff,
> > 
> >> I removed the last sentence in 'pending', please check:
> >> 
> >> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/ath/ath.git/commit/?h=pen
> >> din g&id=26bb149b5e011b0f73f7b74421589cbd38e3304b
> > 
> > Re-reading the commit message, I think it makes sense to also remove the
> > sentence "The ath11k_hw_hal_params_qca6390 uses fewer num_tx_rings than
> > its
> > map, so use a constant to express the correct value.". Do you think it's
> > worth submitting a v4 with this minor change?
> > 
> > Alex
> 
> No need to submit a v4. I can make that change in 'pending'

Thank you!

> /jeff
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.