Re: [PATCH ath-next v3] wifi: ath12k: add QMI capability negotiation for dynamic memory mode

Jeff Johnson <[email protected]>
Newsgroups org.infradead.lists.ath12k,org.kernel.vger.linux-wireless
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On 6/26/2026 1:43 AM, Aaradhana Sahu wrote:
> @@ -2319,11 +2360,14 @@ static void ath12k_qmi_phy_cap_send(struct ath12k_base *ab)
>  
>  	ab->qmi.num_radios = resp.num_phy;
>  
> +	if (resp.dynamic_ddr_support_valid)
> +		ab->qmi.dynamic_ddr_support = resp.dynamic_ddr_support;
> +
>  	ath12k_dbg(ab, ATH12K_DBG_QMI,
> -		   "phy capability resp valid %d single_chip_mlo_support %d valid %d num_phy %d valid %d board_id %d\n",
> +		   "phy capability resp valid %d single_chip_mlo_support %d valid %d num_phy %d valid %d board_id %d dynamic_ddr_valid %u dynamic_ddr_support %u\n",
>  		   resp.single_chip_mlo_support_valid, resp.single_chip_mlo_support,
> -		   resp.num_phy_valid, resp.num_phy,
> -		   resp.board_id_valid, resp.board_id);
> +		   resp.num_phy_valid, resp.num_phy, resp.board_id_valid, resp.board_id,
> +		   resp.dynamic_ddr_support_valid, resp.dynamic_ddr_support);

Your logging change conflicts with the one in:
wifi: ath12k: use %u for unsigned variables in QMI debug logs

That one is already in my pending queue, so I'll have you rebase once that one
lands in ath-next.

/jeff
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.