Re: [PATCH ath-next v3] wifi: ath12k: add QMI capability negotiation for dynamic memory mode
Aaradhana Sahu <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | org.infradead.lists.ath12k,org.kernel.vger.linux-wireless |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 6/30/2026 9:23 PM, Jeff Johnson wrote: > On 6/26/2026 1:43 AM, Aaradhana Sahu wrote: >> @@ -2319,11 +2360,14 @@ static void ath12k_qmi_phy_cap_send(struct ath12k_base *ab) >> >> ab->qmi.num_radios = resp.num_phy; >> >> + if (resp.dynamic_ddr_support_valid) >> + ab->qmi.dynamic_ddr_support = resp.dynamic_ddr_support; >> + >> ath12k_dbg(ab, ATH12K_DBG_QMI, >> - "phy capability resp valid %d single_chip_mlo_support %d valid %d num_phy %d valid %d board_id %d\n", >> + "phy capability resp valid %d single_chip_mlo_support %d valid %d num_phy %d valid %d board_id %d dynamic_ddr_valid %u dynamic_ddr_support %u\n", >> resp.single_chip_mlo_support_valid, resp.single_chip_mlo_support, >> - resp.num_phy_valid, resp.num_phy, >> - resp.board_id_valid, resp.board_id); >> + resp.num_phy_valid, resp.num_phy, resp.board_id_valid, resp.board_id, >> + resp.dynamic_ddr_support_valid, resp.dynamic_ddr_support); > > Your logging change conflicts with the one in: > wifi: ath12k: use %u for unsigned variables in QMI debug logs > > That one is already in my pending queue, so I'll have you rebase once that one > lands in ath-next. > > /jeff > Sure, I will rebase and send next version.