[PATCH net-next] wireless: Use bool function returns of true/false instead of 1/0

Joe Perches <[email protected]>
Newsgroups org.infradead.lists.b43-dev,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel,org.kernel.vger.linux-wireless,org.kernel.vger.netdev
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Sun, 2015-03-29 at 20:46 -0500, Larry Finger wrote:
> On 03/29/2015 08:29 PM, Joe Perches wrote:
> > Use bool constants as the return values instead of 1 and 0.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Joe Perches <[email protected]>
> > ---
> >> To be honest I'd might rather get bunches of these, there has to be a ton
> >> of them, than a slow trickle of one every few weeks/days.
> >
> > There aren't too many here either...
> >
> >   drivers/net/wireless/b43/dma.c                        | 12 ++++++------
> >   drivers/net/wireless/b43legacy/dma.c                  |  6 +++---
> >   drivers/net/wireless/b43legacy/rfkill.c               |  8 ++++----
> >   drivers/net/wireless/brcm80211/brcmsmac/phy/phy_cmn.c |  2 +-
> >   drivers/net/wireless/brcm80211/brcmsmac/phy/phy_lcn.c |  2 +-
> >   drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-config.h             |  4 ++--
> >   6 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
> 
> Please split these into separate patches for each driver. That way it will be 
> possible to search 'git log' for the contributions to each driver. Otherwise, 
> the patches are OK.

It's still possible.

git log <directory> shows the individual patches.
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.