Re: [PATCH 0/2] PBL: constructor fixes

"Sascha Hauer" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups org.infradead.lists.barebox
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On 2026-08-19 16:16, Ahmad Fatoum wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On 8/19/26 4:12 PM, Stefan Kerkmann wrote:
> > Signed-off-by: Stefan Kerkmann <[email protected]>
> > ---
> > Stefan Kerkmann (2):
> >       ARM/ARM64/RISC-V: pbl: guard constructor support
> >       ARM64: setup_c: abi safe link register storage
> 
> if these are applied after what's in next, we would have intermittent
> breakage when doing a bisect right?
> 
> I would suggest either turning these into fixups or just resend the
> whole series.

I just squashed them into the original commit. But next time, yes, you
can send --fixup patches for patches in next.

I just learned there's also --fixup=amend:<commit> for replacing the
original commit message along with the fixup. There's even
--fixup=reword:<commit> for just rewording the commit message without
changing the patch content.

Sascha

--
Pengutronix e.K.                           |                             |
Steuerwalder Str. 21                       | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |
31137 Hildesheim, Germany                  | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0    |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686           | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-5555 |
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.