Re: [PATCH v6 04/12] PCI: liveupdate: Document driver binding responsibilities
Samiullah Khawaja <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | org.infradead.lists.kexec,org.kernel.vger.linux-doc,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel,org.kernel.vger.linux-pci,org.kvack.linux-mm |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Fri, May 22, 2026 at 08:24:02PM +0000, David Matlack wrote: >Document how driver binding works during a Live Update and what the PCI >core expects of drivers and users. Note that this is only a description >of the current division of responsibilities. These can change in the >future if we decide. > >Signed-off-by: David Matlack <[email protected]> >--- > drivers/pci/liveupdate.c | 16 ++++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+) > >diff --git a/drivers/pci/liveupdate.c b/drivers/pci/liveupdate.c >index 96c43b84532c..4f2ec6ffdd16 100644 >--- a/drivers/pci/liveupdate.c >+++ b/drivers/pci/liveupdate.c >@@ -70,6 +70,22 @@ > * preserved. These may be relaxed in the future: > * > * * The device cannot be a Virtual Function (VF). >+ * >+ * Driver Binding >+ * ============== >+ * >+ * In the outgoing kernel, it is the driver's responsibility to ensure that it >+ * does not release a device between pci_liveupdate_preserve() and >+ * pci_liveupdate_unpreserve(). >+ * >+ * In the incoming kernel, it is the driver's responsibility to ensure that it >+ * does not release a preserved device between probe() and >+ * pci_liveupdate_finish(). >+ * >+ * It is the user's responsibility to ensure that incoming preserved devices are >+ * bound to the correct driver. i.e. The PCI core does not protect against a >+ * device getting preserved by driver A in the outgoing kernel and then getting >+ * bound to driver B in the incoming kernel. > */ > > #define pr_fmt(fmt) "PCI: liveupdate: " fmt >-- >2.54.0.746.g67dd491aae-goog > Reviewed-by: Samiullah Khawaja <[email protected]>