Re: [RFC PATCH 2/4] dma/pool: Add an API to check if DMA allocation is from pool

Samiullah Khawaja <[email protected]>
Newsgroups org.infradead.lists.kexec,dev.linux.lists.iommu,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel,org.kvack.linux-mm
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Mon, Jun 08, 2026 at 06:10:02PM +0000, Pranjal Shrivastava wrote:
>On Tue, May 05, 2026 at 12:27:35AM +0000, Samiullah Khawaja wrote:
>> DMA allocations can be done through DMA pools, add an API that can be
>> used to check if an allocation is done from a pool. This will be used in
>> the later commit during preservation of DMA allocation.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Samiullah Khawaja <[email protected]>
>> ---
>>  include/linux/dma-map-ops.h |  1 +
>>  kernel/dma/pool.c           | 13 +++++++++++++
>>  2 files changed, 14 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/include/linux/dma-map-ops.h b/include/linux/dma-map-ops.h
>> index 6a1832a73cad..6a0bc4ea2467 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/dma-map-ops.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/dma-map-ops.h
>> @@ -216,6 +216,7 @@ struct page *dma_alloc_from_pool(struct device *dev, size_t size,
>>  		bool (*phys_addr_ok)(struct device *, phys_addr_t, size_t));
>>  bool dma_free_from_pool(struct device *dev, void *start, size_t size);
>>
>> +bool dma_is_from_pool(struct device *dev, void *start, size_t size);
>>  int dma_direct_set_offset(struct device *dev, phys_addr_t cpu_start,
>>  		dma_addr_t dma_start, u64 size);
>>
>> diff --git a/kernel/dma/pool.c b/kernel/dma/pool.c
>> index 2b2fbb709242..32ce4d6d7683 100644
>> --- a/kernel/dma/pool.c
>> +++ b/kernel/dma/pool.c
>> @@ -307,3 +307,16 @@ bool dma_free_from_pool(struct device *dev, void *start, size_t size)
>>
>>  	return false;
>>  }
>> +
>> +bool dma_is_from_pool(struct device *dev, void *start, size_t size)
>
>Do we need struct device here? It seems unused?
>
>Nit: we only ever pass 0 gfp_flags to dma_guess_pool, should we instead
>name it: dma_is_from_atomic_pool() to be more accurate?

dma_guess_pool() goes through all of them when passing 0, look at the
prev logic inside it and how it is used by the dma_free_from_pool(). But
you are right they are all atomic, but semantically we want to check
whether it is part of any pool so lets keep it as is. WDYT?
>
>> +{
>> +	struct gen_pool *pool = NULL;
>> +
>> +	while ((pool = dma_guess_pool(pool, 0))) {
>> +		if (!gen_pool_has_addr(pool, (unsigned long)start, size))
>> +			continue;
>> +		return true;
>> +	}
>
>Nit: The loop looks slightly ugly, can we have:
>
>struct gen_pool *pool;
>
>for (pool = dma_guess_pool(NULL, 0); pool != NULL; pool = dma_guess_pool(pool, 0)) {
>	if (gen_pool_has_addr(pool, (unsigned long)start, size))
>		return true;
>}

It is a basically a copy dma_free_from_pool() without the free part, so
keeping the style consistent.
>
>> +
>> +	return false;
>> +}
>> --
>> 2.54.0.545.g6539524ca2-goog
>>
>
>Thanks,
>Praan

Thanks,
Sami
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.