Re: [RFC PATCH 0/4] kho: Support preserving unsplit high-order pages

Samiullah Khawaja <[email protected]>
Newsgroups org.infradead.lists.kexec,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel,org.kvack.linux-mm
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Wed, Jul 08, 2026 at 05:05:20PM +0000, Pranjal Shrivastava wrote:
>On Wed, Jul 08, 2026 at 04:36:46PM +0000, Samiullah Khawaja wrote:
>> On Wed, Jul 08, 2026 at 04:11:04PM +0200, Pratyush Yadav wrote:
>> > On Fri, Jul 03 2026, Pranjal Shrivastava wrote:
>> >
>>
>> [snip]
>> > >
>> > > 3. kho_restore_page() applies the correct refcount pattern based on the
>> > >    preserved metadata.
>> >
>> > Why do you need to save the type of pages in KHO metadata? For example,
>> > for pages or folios, we don't store any type information and leave it to
>> > the caller choose the right API. So reserve-mem and kho vmalloc need
>> > pages, they can call kho_{preserve,restore}_pages(), and memfd needs
>> > folios so it can call kho_{preserve,restore}_folio(). The radix tree
>> > itself does not hold the information. The caller knows what its memory
>> > is supposed to be so it calls the right restore API.
>> >
>> > So why can't we add a kho_{preserve,restore}_page_multi() (pick a better
>> > name; we can argue about the naming later)? Then your driver knows it is
>> > restoring DMA buffers so it can call kho_restore_page_multi(), and KHO
>> > takes care of initializing the pages with the right refcounts.
>> >
>> > You won't have to muck about with the ABI in that case.
>>
>> +1
>>
>> I think this makes sense. The mm already relies on the allocator to
>> track the type of pages it has and expectes it to use free_pages or
>> put_page() or free_page(), so it is natural for KHO to rely on the
>> caller to call the right restore API.
>>
>> Lets add kho_preserve/restore_page_contig|_order|_nonsplit and the dma
>> preservation can use the appropriate one during restore.
>
>Ack. I like kho_restore_contig, I don't think we'll need a preserve for
>this though? Preserve doesn't seem to be preserving refcounts, I guess
>we could rely on kho_preserve_pages and the caller can use
>kho_restore_pages_contig() to set refcount correctly for unsplit pages?

I think for consistency we can add both, even if preserve doesn't do
anything special internally.
>
>Thanks
>Praan

Sami
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.