Re: [PATCH v4 0/2] LoongArch: kexec: avoid clobbering the QEMU FDT
George Guo <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | org.infradead.lists.kexec,dev.linux.lists.loongarch,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi Huacai, Thanks for the correction, and I am sorry for the way I handled this. > Who told you the trampoline is dead code? All non-boot CPUs are > running in the trampoline, you can use maxcpus=1 to go to the new > kernel, and do something, and then hotplug the non-boot CPUs at any > time. You are right, and I was wrong to call the trampoline dead once the new kernel starts. The non-boot CPUs spin in kexec_smp_wait inside the trampoline buffer and only leave it when the new kernel brings them online, so with maxcpus=1 they stay there until a later CPU hotplug. The buffer has to stay valid the whole time. That breaks my patch 1. control_code_page is allocated by the kexec core and is not reserved in the new kernel, so the new kernel can reuse that page while the non-boot CPUs are still spinning in it, and small memory makes that more likely. The fixed KEXEC_CONTROL_CODE at 0x100000 avoided this because the first 2MB is memblock_reserve()d in both kernels; its only problem was that it overlaps QEMU's machine FDT at 0x100000. So my Q2 answer in the cover letter was also wrong, and "as arm64/riscv do" does not apply here. So the trampoline still needs to live in the cross-kexec reserved first 2MB, just not on top of the FDT. The FDT declares fdt_totalsize 1MB and covers [0x100000, 0x200000), so the room left is below 0x100000. Do you have a different fix in mind? I would like to agree on the direction with you before I send anything. > BTW, you have never replied to my comments, all you have done is > submit new versions again and again. That is fair, and it was my mistake. I should have replied to your review in the thread and discussed it before sending a new version, instead of putting my answers in a cover letter. I will reply to comments first from now on. I will hold the series until we settle the trampoline approach. Thanks, George