Re: [PATCH v4 0/2] kho: support preserving high-order non-compound pages
Pranjal Shrivastava <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | org.infradead.lists.kexec,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel,org.kvack.linux-mm |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Wed, Aug 12, 2026 at 12:32:25PM +0200, Pratyush Yadav wrote: > On Tue, Aug 11 2026, Mike Rapoport wrote: > > > Hi Pranjal, > > > > On Mon, Aug 03, 2026 at 11:39:41AM +0000, Pranjal Shrivastava wrote: > >> Introduction > >> ============ > >> This series is required for the ongoing effort to preserve DMA allocations > >> across KHO [1]. It addresses a fundamental mismatch between the current KHO > >> restoration logic and the physical reality of high-order buddy allocations. > > > > I skimmed through the patches, they look fine to me before the in-depth > > review :) > > > > But we are really close to the merge window, so we'll anyway need to > > reiterate after v7.3-rc1. > > > >> The Problem > >> =========== > >> The current KHO restore implementation treats all multi-page blocks as > >> split pages during restoration. Specifically, kho_restore_pages() > >> initializes every 4KB sub-page with a refcount of 1. > >> > >> However, many kernel subsystems, most notably the DMA allocator (via > >> dma_alloc_coherent), frequently return high-order non-compound pages. > >> In this state, only the head page carries a refcount of 1, while > >> all tail pages have a refcount of 0. > > > > This hints that these patches could be a part of the DMA preservation > > series, unless you expect other users of the new API. > > > > Generally, we don't merge new APIs without the users and if DMA > > preservation is the only user, it's better to fold these two patches there. > > Makes sense I think. We can review the patches here, but then they can > go in with the DMA series. > So.. IIUC, I'll post a v5 here as a standalone series till we get consensus, and finally the reviewed patches can be folded with the DMA series? Thanks, Praan