Re: [PATCH] kexec: return -ENOEXEC from image probe functions on mismatch
Philipp Rudo <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | org.infradead.lists.kexec,dev.linux.lists.loongarch,org.infradead.lists.linux-arm-kernel,org.infradead.lists.linux-riscv,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel |
|---|---|
| Organization | Red Hat inc. |
| Message-ID | <20260813151350.6b511155@rotkaeppchen> |
Hi Mukesh, the patch looks good to me. There is also a corresponding kexec-tools patch, which was accidentally opened as a Github PR (https://github.com/horms/kexec-tools/pull/12). It will be sent to [email protected] shortly. Thanks Reviewed-by: Philipp Rudo <[email protected]> On Thu, 13 Aug 2026 12:36:29 +0530 Mukesh Pilaniya <[email protected]> wrote: > Several kexec_file_load() image probe functions return -EINVAL when > they do not recognize the image format. A probe function that rejects > an image should return -ENOEXEC to indicate that the image is not a > recognized executable format. -EINVAL implies a problem with the > syscall parameters, not with image recognition. > > kexec_image_probe_default() iterates through registered loaders and > returns the last probe's error code to the caller. That error > propagates as the kexec_file_load() return value to userspace. > Returning -EINVAL from a probe when no loader matches is semantically > incorrect and misleads userspace about the nature of the failure. > > Return -ENOEXEC from all probe functions and their helpers when the > image format is not recognized. > > Signed-off-by: Mukesh Pilaniya <[email protected]> > --- > branch: next-20260812 > base commit: 28d012efb4327f9c75d5e042a7c91e9a542efa98 > --- > arch/arm64/kernel/kexec_image.c | 4 ++-- > arch/loongarch/kernel/kexec_efi.c | 4 ++-- > arch/riscv/kernel/kexec_image.c | 4 ++-- > kernel/kexec_elf.c | 4 ++-- > 4 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/kexec_image.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/kexec_image.c > index b70f4df15a1a..101259874d44 100644 > --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/kexec_image.c > +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/kexec_image.c > @@ -25,10 +25,10 @@ static int image_probe(const char *kernel_buf, unsigned long kernel_len) > (const struct arm64_image_header *)(kernel_buf); > > if (!h || (kernel_len < sizeof(*h))) > - return -EINVAL; > + return -ENOEXEC; > > if (memcmp(&h->magic, ARM64_IMAGE_MAGIC, sizeof(h->magic))) > - return -EINVAL; > + return -ENOEXEC; > > return 0; > } > diff --git a/arch/loongarch/kernel/kexec_efi.c b/arch/loongarch/kernel/kexec_efi.c > index 5ee78ebb1546..28a1d0420ba3 100644 > --- a/arch/loongarch/kernel/kexec_efi.c > +++ b/arch/loongarch/kernel/kexec_efi.c > @@ -24,12 +24,12 @@ static int efi_kexec_probe(const char *kernel_buf, unsigned long kernel_len) > > if (!h || (kernel_len < sizeof(*h))) { > kexec_dprintk("No LoongArch image header.\n"); > - return -EINVAL; > + return -ENOEXEC; > } > > if (!loongarch_header_check_dos_sig(h)) { > kexec_dprintk("No LoongArch PE image header.\n"); > - return -EINVAL; > + return -ENOEXEC; > } > > return 0; > diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/kexec_image.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/kexec_image.c > index 51dc89259f16..963a25f5b55b 100644 > --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/kexec_image.c > +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/kexec_image.c > @@ -20,7 +20,7 @@ static int image_probe(const char *kernel_buf, unsigned long kernel_len) > const struct riscv_image_header *h = (const struct riscv_image_header *)kernel_buf; > > if (!h || kernel_len < sizeof(*h)) > - return -EINVAL; > + return -ENOEXEC; > > /* According to Documentation/arch/riscv/boot-image-header.rst, > * use "magic2" field to check when version >= 0.2. > @@ -28,7 +28,7 @@ static int image_probe(const char *kernel_buf, unsigned long kernel_len) > > if (h->version >= RISCV_HEADER_VERSION && > memcmp(&h->magic2, RISCV_IMAGE_MAGIC2, sizeof(h->magic2))) > - return -EINVAL; > + return -ENOEXEC; > > return 0; > } > diff --git a/kernel/kexec_elf.c b/kernel/kexec_elf.c > index 3a5c25b2adc9..89a444a00693 100644 > --- a/kernel/kexec_elf.c > +++ b/kernel/kexec_elf.c > @@ -172,7 +172,7 @@ static int elf_read_ehdr(const char *buf, size_t len, struct elfhdr *ehdr) > > default: > pr_debug("Unknown ELF class.\n"); > - return -EINVAL; > + return -ENOEXEC; > } > > return elf_is_ehdr_sane(ehdr, len) ? 0 : -ENOEXEC; > @@ -236,7 +236,7 @@ static int elf_read_phdr(const char *buf, size_t len, > > default: > pr_debug("Unknown ELF class.\n"); > - return -EINVAL; > + return -ENOEXEC; > } > > return elf_is_phdr_sane(phdr, len) ? 0 : -ENOEXEC; > > --- > base-commit: 28d012efb4327f9c75d5e042a7c91e9a542efa98 > change-id: 20260813-mpilaniy-ffb0cc92c313 > > Best regards, > -- > Mukesh Pilaniya <[email protected]> >