Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] kexec: fix error propagation in kexec_image_probe_default()

Philipp Rudo <[email protected]>
Newsgroups org.infradead.lists.kexec,dev.linux.lists.loongarch,org.infradead.lists.linux-arm-kernel,org.infradead.lists.linux-riscv,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel
Organization Red Hat inc.
Message-ID <20260821104026.07b7a31d@rotkaeppchen>
Hi Pratyush,

On Thu, 20 Aug 2026 20:11:14 +0200
Pratyush Yadav <[email protected]> wrote:

> On Thu, Aug 20 2026, Philipp Rudo wrote:
> 
> > Hi Mukesh,
> > Hi Pratyush,
> >
> > having this patch makes sense. Personally I'd go with having a
> > switch-case rather than individual if-blocks. E.g.
> >
> > 	switch (ret) {
> > 		case 0:
> > 			image->fops = *fops;
> > 			return 0;
> > 		case -ENOEXEC:
> > 			continue;
> > 		default:
> > 			return ret;
> > 	}
> >
> > IMHO that is better readable and easier to extend in case other error
> > codes need special handling as well. But that is only my personal
> > opinion.  
> 
> Well, IMO both look roughly the same so I unless Mukesh prefers your
> version more, we can keep it as-is.

that's why I've marked it as a personal preference. I don't expect
Mukesh to switch to it. Still I thought it is worth mentioning just to
give an other perspective.

> >
> > Independent on which implementation you use.
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Philipp Rudo <[email protected]>  
> 
> Thanks for reviewing!
> 
> One tiny suggestion. Can you please reply in-line the next time around?
> It is a bit easier reading this response below the code that it refers
> to.

Agree, especially with larger, more complex patches. In this case
however, I thought that the patch is so small that it wouldn't make
much of a difference.
Anyway, I'll reply in-line next time in such cases as well.

Thanks for your review!
Philipp

> >
> >
> > On Wed, 19 Aug 2026 23:17:23 +0530
> > Mukesh Pilaniya <[email protected]> wrote:
> >  
> >> kexec_image_probe_default() overwrites ret with each loader's probe
> >> return value and returns whatever the last loader returned when no
> >> probe matches.  The error code reaching userspace depends on whichever
> >> loader happens to be last in kexec_file_loaders[].
> >> 
> >> Only continue to the next loader when a probe returns -ENOEXEC.
> >> Propagate any other error such as -ENOMEM immediately. Return -ENOEXEC
> >> only when all loaders have been tried and none matched.
> >> 
> >> Suggested-by: Pratyush Yadav <[email protected]>
> >> Signed-off-by: Mukesh Pilaniya <[email protected]>
> >> ---
> >>  kernel/kexec_file.c | 12 +++++++-----
> >>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> >> 
> >> diff --git a/kernel/kexec_file.c b/kernel/kexec_file.c
> >> index 59fb9d71e9d8..b3060e984ef3 100644
> >> --- a/kernel/kexec_file.c
> >> +++ b/kernel/kexec_file.c
> >> @@ -68,17 +68,19 @@ int kexec_image_probe_default(struct kimage *image, void *buf,
> >>  			      unsigned long buf_len)
> >>  {
> >>  	const struct kexec_file_ops * const *fops;
> >> -	int ret = -ENOEXEC;
> >>  
> >>  	for (fops = &kexec_file_loaders[0]; *fops && (*fops)->probe; ++fops) {
> >> -		ret = (*fops)->probe(buf, buf_len);
> >> -		if (!ret) {
> >> +		int ret = (*fops)->probe(buf, buf_len);
> >> +
> >> +		if (ret == 0) {
> >>  			image->fops = *fops;
> >> -			return ret;
> >> +			return 0;
> >>  		}
> >> +		if (ret != -ENOEXEC)
> >> +			return ret;
> >>  	}
> >>  
> >> -	return ret;
> >> +	return -ENOEXEC;
> >>  }
> >>  
> >>  static void *kexec_image_load_default(struct kimage *image)
> >>   
> >  
>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.