[PATCH v5 17/17] riscv: hwprobe: Introduce rva23u64 base behavior

Guodong Xu <[email protected]>
Newsgroups org.infradead.lists.kvm-riscv,dev.linux.lists.sophgo,dev.linux.lists.spacemit,org.infradead.lists.linux-riscv,org.kernel.vger.kvm,org.kernel.vger.linux-devicetree,org.kernel.vger.linux-doc,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel,org.kernel.vger.linux-kselftest
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Provide a hwprobe base-behavior bit so userspace can check RVA23U64
support in one call.  Without it, a consumer needs five hwprobe
calls and four prctl calls, which is error-prone to require of every
caller.  Most software treats RVA23U64 as a new base anyway, so
expose it directly.

Signed-off-by: Andrew Jones <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Guodong Xu <[email protected]>
---
v5: No change.
v4: No change.
v3: No change.
v2:
- Detect RVA23U64 by reading from the cached hart_isa[].isa_bases
  bitmap populated by riscv_init_isa_bases() at init time, sharing
  one source of truth with /proc/cpuinfo.
---
 Documentation/arch/riscv/hwprobe.rst               |  8 ++++++++
 arch/riscv/include/uapi/asm/hwprobe.h              |  3 ++-
 arch/riscv/kernel/sys_hwprobe.c                    | 23 +++++++++++++++-------
 tools/testing/selftests/riscv/hwprobe/which-cpus.c |  2 +-
 4 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/arch/riscv/hwprobe.rst b/Documentation/arch/riscv/hwprobe.rst
index 32a14331eb9de..dc70470093b1b 100644
--- a/Documentation/arch/riscv/hwprobe.rst
+++ b/Documentation/arch/riscv/hwprobe.rst
@@ -67,6 +67,14 @@ The following keys are defined:
       programs (it may still be executed in userspace via a
       kernel-controlled mechanism such as the vDSO).
 
+  * :c:macro:`RISCV_HWPROBE_BASE_BEHAVIOR_RVA23U64`: Support for all mandatory
+    extensions of RVA23U64, as defined in the RISC-V Profiles specification
+    starting from commit 0273f3c921b6 ("rva23/rvb23 ratified").
+
+    The RVA23U64 base is based upon the IMA base and therefore IMA extension
+    keys (e.g. :c:macro:`RISCV_HWPROBE_KEY_IMA_EXT_0`:) may be used to probe
+    optional extensions.
+
 * :c:macro:`RISCV_HWPROBE_KEY_IMA_EXT_0`: A bitmask containing extensions
   that are compatible with the :c:macro:`RISCV_HWPROBE_BASE_BEHAVIOR_IMA`:
   base system behavior.
diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/uapi/asm/hwprobe.h b/arch/riscv/include/uapi/asm/hwprobe.h
index 36ec8ab470423..50733d3db7633 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/include/uapi/asm/hwprobe.h
+++ b/arch/riscv/include/uapi/asm/hwprobe.h
@@ -21,7 +21,8 @@ struct riscv_hwprobe {
 #define RISCV_HWPROBE_KEY_MARCHID	1
 #define RISCV_HWPROBE_KEY_MIMPID	2
 #define RISCV_HWPROBE_KEY_BASE_BEHAVIOR	3
-#define		RISCV_HWPROBE_BASE_BEHAVIOR_IMA	(1 << 0)
+#define		RISCV_HWPROBE_BASE_BEHAVIOR_IMA		(1 << 0)
+#define		RISCV_HWPROBE_BASE_BEHAVIOR_RVA23U64	(1 << 1)
 #define RISCV_HWPROBE_KEY_IMA_EXT_0	4
 #define		RISCV_HWPROBE_IMA_FD		(1 << 0)
 #define		RISCV_HWPROBE_IMA_C		(1 << 1)
diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/sys_hwprobe.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/sys_hwprobe.c
index 3e80e5551ae0d..3f66f2e99d41a 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/kernel/sys_hwprobe.c
+++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/sys_hwprobe.c
@@ -226,6 +226,17 @@ static bool hwprobe_ext0_has(const struct cpumask *cpus, u64 ext)
 	return (pair.value & ext);
 }
 
+static bool hwprobe_has_isa_base(const struct cpumask *cpus, unsigned int base)
+{
+	int cpu;
+
+	for_each_cpu(cpu, cpus) {
+		if (!test_bit(base, hart_isa[cpu].isa_bases))
+			return false;
+	}
+	return true;
+}
+
 #if defined(CONFIG_RISCV_PROBE_UNALIGNED_ACCESS)
 static u64 hwprobe_misaligned(const struct cpumask *cpus)
 {
@@ -308,14 +319,12 @@ static void hwprobe_one_pair(struct riscv_hwprobe *pair,
 	case RISCV_HWPROBE_KEY_MIMPID:
 		hwprobe_arch_id(pair, cpus);
 		break;
-	/*
-	 * The kernel already assumes that the base single-letter ISA
-	 * extensions are supported on all harts, and only supports the
-	 * IMA base, so just cheat a bit here and tell that to
-	 * userspace.
-	 */
 	case RISCV_HWPROBE_KEY_BASE_BEHAVIOR:
-		pair->value = RISCV_HWPROBE_BASE_BEHAVIOR_IMA;
+		pair->value = 0;
+		if (hwprobe_has_isa_base(cpus, RISCV_ISA_BASE_IMA))
+			pair->value |= RISCV_HWPROBE_BASE_BEHAVIOR_IMA;
+		if (hwprobe_has_isa_base(cpus, RISCV_ISA_BASE_RVA23U64))
+			pair->value |= RISCV_HWPROBE_BASE_BEHAVIOR_RVA23U64;
 		break;
 
 	case RISCV_HWPROBE_KEY_IMA_EXT_0:
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/riscv/hwprobe/which-cpus.c b/tools/testing/selftests/riscv/hwprobe/which-cpus.c
index 587feb198c049..f8c797b1d0fd9 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/riscv/hwprobe/which-cpus.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/riscv/hwprobe/which-cpus.c
@@ -105,7 +105,7 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
 	pairs[0] = (struct riscv_hwprobe){ .key = RISCV_HWPROBE_KEY_BASE_BEHAVIOR, };
 	rc = riscv_hwprobe(pairs, 1, 0, NULL, 0);
 	assert(rc == 0 && pairs[0].key == RISCV_HWPROBE_KEY_BASE_BEHAVIOR &&
-	       pairs[0].value == RISCV_HWPROBE_BASE_BEHAVIOR_IMA);
+	       (pairs[0].value & RISCV_HWPROBE_BASE_BEHAVIOR_IMA));
 
 	pairs[0] = (struct riscv_hwprobe){ .key = RISCV_HWPROBE_KEY_IMA_EXT_0, };
 	rc = riscv_hwprobe(pairs, 1, 0, NULL, 0);

-- 
2.43.0


-- 
kvm-riscv mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kvm-riscv
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.