Re: [PATCH] ASoC: meson: axg-tdm-formatter: Use guard() for mutex locks
Mark Brown <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | org.infradead.lists.linux-amlogic,org.infradead.lists.linux-arm-kernel,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel,org.kernel.vger.linux-sound |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Wed, Jun 10, 2026 at 02:54:08PM +0200, Jerome Brunet wrote: > On mer. 10 juin 2026 at 17:21, [email protected] wrote: > > Clean up the code using guard() for mutex locks. > > Merely code refactoring, and no behavior change. > I suppose it is OK but it does not seem to really clean anything and > make the code easier to follow in that instance, from my perspective at > least. > If there is policy to systematically use guard() whenever > possible then OK, otherwise it seems unnecessary. I don't know about policy but there's definitely people who are keen on converting things to this pattern. _______________________________________________ linux-amlogic mailing list [email protected] http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-amlogic
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 488 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAABCgAdFiEEreZoqmdXGLWf4p/qJNaLcl1Uh9AFAmopht0ACgkQJNaLcl1U h9CzRwgAgDswQDXFyzP5z4rETNyEf3MQAZYJYQ3LTNsRsjBW0i3YBsbEwiJoeDF5 jfTgd6UguAKKbHKzgkWe6qbYY2bUjMVI3xANcR4Uyd6SbyS92RpWyDH729+mDbLK bP3l4yAWtiGfSsDqDASxflSVpkWJmSFcImDX9QxoEc8L94Xynh4V6Ju3g4U5mo1t Z1sZmpt5uktyvYaTqt8KISlILUGBNzd3XGsmCZYLD+BhPprmyuPKpvDLPho+zXkP +Uop8nWZpZGNNo2iJN5szX8ZEO3XVKsaXLcsbc4PeKNhqf02cu2S5aZm1N9az+Rq 1L7IGgsO7TnmOy1C6O6pK/6Hd9d31Q== =eN3r -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----