Re: [PATCH 0/2] gpio: fix sleeping-in-atomic in shared-proxy; restore meson non-sleeping

Bartosz Golaszewski <[email protected]>
Newsgroups org.infradead.lists.linux-amlogic,org.infradead.lists.linux-arm-kernel,org.kernel.vger.linux-gpio,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel
Message-ID <CAMRc=MercPNLWJd7JkGKQh85wwK+58KGqUgAKAYZhXvkC1Nu8g@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, Jun 10, 2026 at 5:41 PM Viacheslav Bocharov <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> gpio-shared-proxy chooses its descriptor lock (mutex vs spinlock) from
> the underlying chip's can_sleep, but under that lock it calls config and
> direction ops that reach sleeping pinctrl paths. On a controller with
> non-sleeping MMIO value ops the lock is a spinlock, so a sleeping call
> runs from atomic context:
>

Why am I seeing three versions of this in my inbox? Which one should I review?

Bartosz

_______________________________________________
linux-amlogic mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-amlogic
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.