Re: [PATCH net-next v11 1/7] dt-bindings: phy: document the serdes PHY on sa8255p
Vinod Koul <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | org.infradead.lists.linux-amlogic,dev.linux.lists.imx,dev.linux.lists.linux-sunxi,dev.linux.lists.sophgo,org.infradead.lists.linux-arm-kernel,org.infradead.lists.linux-riscv,org.infradead.lists.linux-rockchip,org.kernel.vger.linux-arm-msm,org.kernel.vger.linux-devicetree,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel,org.kernel.vger.linux-mips,org.kernel.vger.linux-renesas-soc,org.kernel.vger.netdev |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <akOZFIowVvprnAMf@vaman> |
On 29-06-26, 16:51, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > > Russell King asked me to put the PHY logic for SCMI pm domains into the PHY > > driver instead of the MAC driver where it was previously. Instead of cramming > > both HLOS and firmware handling into the same driver, I figured it makes more > > sense to have a dedicated, cleaner driver as the two share very little code (if > > any). > > I think you are mixing up DT bindings and driver implementation? Should the bindings change if we have different driver and firmware implementations? Isn't binding supposed to be agnostic of implementations..? -- ~Vinod _______________________________________________ linux-amlogic mailing list [email protected] http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-amlogic