Re: [PATCH 2/2] arm64: dts: amlogic: a9: Add IR controller support

Martin Blumenstingl <[email protected]>
Newsgroups org.infradead.lists.linux-amlogic,org.infradead.lists.linux-arm-kernel,org.kernel.vger.linux-devicetree,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel,org.kernel.vger.linux-media
Message-ID <CAFBinCBQ+g8Kr2tL9ob9PvTakGrtwH3qZWjEy-ytGiufGUEieg@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, Jul 8, 2026 at 4:39 AM Xianwei Zhao <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Hi Martin,
>     Thanks for your review.
>
> On 2026/7/8 03:33, Martin Blumenstingl wrote:
> > Hi Xianwei Zhao,
> >
> > On Mon, Jul 6, 2026 at 4:43 AM Xianwei Zhao via B4 Relay
> > <[email protected]>  wrote:
> > [...]
> >> +                               func-ir-in {
> >> +                                       remote_pins: group-remote-pins {
> > Can we keep the established naming:
> > $ git grep remote_input_ao_pins arch/arm64/boot/dts/amlogic/ | wc -l
> > 37
> >
> > I'm worried that adding IR blaster/output support at some point will
> > then lead to confusion.
> >
> Will do. I will rename remote_input_ao_pins.
I'm also happy with remote_input_d_pins or however the datasheet calls
this pin/function (seeing that A9 has AO, C, D and TEST pins in the
always-on domain).
The part that's important for me: include "input" in the name (so it's
clear that this is IR input, not IR output).

_______________________________________________
linux-amlogic mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-amlogic
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.