Re: [PATCH v5 03/49] irqchip/gic-v5: Set up gic_kvm_info on ACPI hosts

Lorenzo Pieralisi <[email protected]>
Newsgroups org.infradead.lists.linux-arm-kernel,dev.linux.lists.kvmarm,org.kernel.vger.kvm
Message-ID <anXhPp9QUH_rOn2X@red-moon>
On Fri, Aug 07, 2026 at 11:14:07AM +0000, Sascha Bischoff wrote:
> Device-tree based GICv5 probing already passes the IRS details and
> maintenance interrupt to KVM, but the ACPI path only initialises the
> irqchip and installs the ACPI IRQ model. As a result, KVM never sees
> the GICv5 host information required to probe the vGIC on ACPI systems.
> 
> Add the ACPI equivalent of the DT KVM setup. Parse the MADT GICC
> entries for the maintenance interrupt, retaining the value from the
> first relevant entry and warning if later entries disagree. Warn if
> firmware describes the interrupt as edge-triggered, but register it as
> a level-sensitive, active-high GSI. Pass the resulting IRQ together
> with the IRS base and coherency information to KVM.
> 
> Native GICv5 does not require a maintenance interrupt unless the
> legacy GICv3-compatible CPU interface is present, so preserve the
> existing no-maintenance-IRQ handling for that case.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Sascha Bischoff <[email protected]>
> ---
>  drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v5.c | 95 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>  1 file changed, 91 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

Just a bunch of nits below.

> diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v5.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v5.c
> index e7a7aedcfaf78..5b8ea8551d832 100644
> --- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v5.c
> +++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v5.c
> @@ -1126,7 +1126,7 @@ static void gicv5_set_cpuif_idbits(void)
>  #ifdef CONFIG_KVM
>  static struct gic_kvm_info gic_v5_kvm_info __initdata;
>  
> -static void __init gic_of_setup_kvm_info(struct device_node *node)
> +static void __init gic_setup_kvm_info(unsigned int maint_irq)
>  {
>  	struct gicv5_irs_chip_data *irs_data = gicv5_irs_get_chip_data();
>  
> @@ -1137,17 +1137,19 @@ static void __init gic_of_setup_kvm_info(struct device_node *node)
>  	 */
>  	if (!gicv5_global_data.virt_capable) {
>  		pr_info("GIC implementation is not virtualization capable\n");
> -		return;
> +		goto out_dispose_maint_irq;

Isn't it cleaner to dispose the mapping in the caller (by returning an
error value) rather than here ?

I appreciate this keeps the IRQ mapping disposal in one place but it
decouples the allocation from the failure path.

>  	}
>  
> -	gic_v5_kvm_info.type = GIC_V5;
> +	if (WARN_ON(!irs_data))
> +		goto out_dispose_maint_irq;
>  
> +	gic_v5_kvm_info.type = GIC_V5;
>  	gic_v5_kvm_info.gicv5_irs.base = irs_data->irs_base;
>  	gic_v5_kvm_info.gicv5_irs.non_coherent = !!(irs_data->flags & IRS_FLAGS_NON_COHERENT);
>  
>  	/* GIC Virtual CPU interface maintenance interrupt */
>  	gic_v5_kvm_info.no_maint_irq_mask = false;
> -	gic_v5_kvm_info.maint_irq = irq_of_parse_and_map(node, 0);
> +	gic_v5_kvm_info.maint_irq = maint_irq;
>  
>  	/*
>  	 * We require an MI if we have legacy support, but don't, otherwise.
> @@ -1162,11 +1164,95 @@ static void __init gic_of_setup_kvm_info(struct device_node *node)
>  		gic_v5_kvm_info.no_maint_irq_mask = true;
>  
>  	vgic_set_kvm_info(&gic_v5_kvm_info);
> +	return;
> +
> +out_dispose_maint_irq:
> +	irq_dispose_mapping(maint_irq);
> +}
> +
> +static void __init gic_of_setup_kvm_info(struct device_node *node)
> +{
> +	/* GIC Virtual CPU interface maintenance interrupt */
> +	gic_setup_kvm_info(irq_of_parse_and_map(node, 0));
> +}
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI
> +struct gicv5_acpi_kvm_info {
> +	u32 maint_irq;
> +};
> +
> +static struct gicv5_acpi_kvm_info acpi_v5_kvm_info __initdata;
> +
> +static int __init gic_acpi_parse_virt_madt_gicc(union acpi_subtable_headers *header,
> +						const unsigned long end)
> +{
> +	struct acpi_madt_generic_interrupt *gicc =
> +		(struct acpi_madt_generic_interrupt *)header;
> +	static int first_madt = true;
> +
> +	if (!(gicc->flags &
> +	      (ACPI_MADT_ENABLED | ACPI_MADT_GICC_ONLINE_CAPABLE)))
> +		return 0;

This would count as a valid parsed entry even though you don't retrieve the
maintanance interrupt number, more below.

> +
> +	if (gicc->flags & ACPI_MADT_VGIC_IRQ_MODE)
> +		pr_warn_once(FW_BUG "MI wrongly advertised as Edge-triggered\n");
> +
> +	if (first_madt) {
> +		first_madt = false;
> +
> +		acpi_v5_kvm_info.maint_irq = gicc->vgic_interrupt;
> +		return 0;
> +	}
> +
> +	if (acpi_v5_kvm_info.maint_irq != gicc->vgic_interrupt)
> +		pr_warn_once(FW_BUG "MI not the same on all CPUs\n");
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static bool __init gic_acpi_collect_virt_info(void)
> +{
> +	int count;
> +
> +	count = acpi_table_parse_madt(ACPI_MADT_TYPE_GENERIC_INTERRUPT,
> +				      gic_acpi_parse_virt_madt_gicc, 0);
> +
> +	return count > 0;
>  }
> +
> +static void __init gic_acpi_setup_kvm_info(void)
> +{
> +	unsigned int maint_irq = 0;
> +	int irq;
> +
> +	if (!gic_acpi_collect_virt_info()) {
> +		pr_warn("Unable to get hardware information used for virtualization\n");
> +		return;
> +	}

Nit: gic_acpi_collect_virt_info() might return true and you still don't get
the info you need. Now, at least one GICC entry should be enabled and online
capable (we are booting on a core after all but never overestimate ACPI tables :))
so this is theory but I thought I would mention it.

> +
> +	if (acpi_v5_kvm_info.maint_irq) {
> +		irq = acpi_register_gsi(NULL, acpi_v5_kvm_info.maint_irq,
> +					ACPI_LEVEL_SENSITIVE,
> +					ACPI_ACTIVE_HIGH);
> +		if (irq > 0)
> +			maint_irq = irq;
> +		else
> +			pr_warn("Failed to register GSI for GICv5 maintenance IRQ\n");

Another nit: do we really need the maint_irq variable ?

Thanks,
Lorenzo

> +	}
> +
> +	gic_setup_kvm_info(maint_irq);
> +}
> +#endif // CONFIG_ACPI
>  #else
>  static inline void __init gic_of_setup_kvm_info(struct device_node *node)
>  {
>  }
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI
> +static inline void __init gic_acpi_setup_kvm_info(void)
> +{
> +}
> +#endif
>  #endif // CONFIG_KVM
>  
>  static int __init gicv5_init_common(struct fwnode_handle *parent_domain)
> @@ -1265,6 +1351,7 @@ static int __init gic_acpi_init(union acpi_subtable_headers *header, const unsig
>  		goto out_irs;
>  
>  	acpi_set_irq_model(ACPI_IRQ_MODEL_GIC_V5, gic_v5_get_gsi_domain_id);
> +	gic_acpi_setup_kvm_info();
>  
>  	return 0;
>  
> -- 
> 2.34.1
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.