Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] ARM/arm64: dts: st: fix node ordering in ST board device trees

Alexandre TORGUE <[email protected]>
Newsgroups org.infradead.lists.linux-arm-kernel,org.kernel.vger.linux-devicetree,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hi Amélie

On 6/12/26 14:56, Amelie Delaunay wrote:
> In the ST board DTS files, &label entries must be ordered
> alphanumerically.
> Over time, several nodes ended up out of order as a side effect of
> adding new features or refactoring existing ones.
> This series restores the correct alphanumeric ordering across
> all ST board DTS files, with no functional change.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Amelie Delaunay <[email protected]>
> ---
> Changes in v2:
> - Fix typo in commit message of patch 1.
> - Link to v1: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
> 
> ---
> Amelie Delaunay (5):
>        arm64: dts: st: reorder ommanager node in stm32mp257f-ev1.dts
>        ARM: dts: stm32: reorder cs_cti_trace node in stm32mp135f-dk.dts
>        ARM: dts: stm32: reorder cs_cti_trace node in stm32mp15xx-dkx.dtsi
>        ARM: dts: stm32: reorder cs_cti_trace node in stm32mp157c-ev1.dts
>        ARM: dts: stm32: reorder mdma1 node in stm32mp15*-scmi.dts
> 
>   arch/arm/boot/dts/st/stm32mp135f-dk.dts       |  4 +-
>   arch/arm/boot/dts/st/stm32mp157a-dk1-scmi.dts |  8 ++--
>   arch/arm/boot/dts/st/stm32mp157c-dk2-scmi.dts |  8 ++--
>   arch/arm/boot/dts/st/stm32mp157c-ed1-scmi.dts |  8 ++--
>   arch/arm/boot/dts/st/stm32mp157c-ev1-scmi.dts |  8 ++--
>   arch/arm/boot/dts/st/stm32mp157c-ev1.dts      |  6 +--
>   arch/arm/boot/dts/st/stm32mp15xx-dkx.dtsi     |  6 +--
>   arch/arm64/boot/dts/st/stm32mp257f-ev1.dts    | 56 +++++++++++++--------------
>   8 files changed, 52 insertions(+), 52 deletions(-)
> ---
> base-commit: fba4a31a7f3b6b29b01c83180f83e7ed4c398738
> change-id: 20260611-node_reordering-4b9b132b007f
> 
> Best regards,

Series applied on stm32-next.

Regards
Alex
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.