Re: [PATCH] bus: sunxi-rsb: fix usage_count leak when autosuspend_delay is negative
Johan Hovold <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | org.infradead.lists.linux-arm-kernel,dev.linux.lists.linux-sunxi,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel,org.kernel.vger.stable |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Sat, Aug 08, 2026 at 02:20:29PM +0800, Guangshuo Li wrote:
> sunxi_rsb_probe() calls pm_runtime_use_autosuspend(), but
> sunxi_rsb_remove() does not call the matching
> pm_runtime_dont_use_autosuspend() before disabling runtime PM.
>
> If the autosuspend delay is set to a negative value while autosuspend
> is enabled, the runtime PM core increments usage_count to prevent
> runtime suspend. Without calling pm_runtime_dont_use_autosuspend()
> during driver teardown, this reference is not dropped and usage_count
> remains unbalanced.
As I've explained elsewhere, this is just misleading. There is no usage
count leak here as the count is balanced whenever the user re-enables
autosuspend through sysfs (by writing a non-negative timeout).
Drivers should clean up after themselves and disable autosuspend, but
this is more of a clean up than a fix and should not be backported.
You've sent upwards of 60 of these in the matter of just a few days,
some of which have even been picked up. Please send follow-ups (replies
or v2s) as soon as possible to prevent further of these from getting
merged.
> Add the missing pm_runtime_dont_use_autosuspend() call before disabling
> runtime PM.
>
> This issue was found by manual code inspection.
>
> Fixes: 4a0dbc12e618 ("bus: sunxi-rsb: Implement runtime power management")
> Cc: [email protected]
> Signed-off-by: Guangshuo Li <[email protected]>
Johan